Everyone who uses this construction speaks as if state-ordered discrimination against us is a hypothetical they pledge to one day oppose rather than a priority of a currently-ascendant fascist movement and the topic of a Supreme Court case that's four days away
Reposted from
Tom Scocca
"The basic right of trans people to live in safety and dignity, free from discrimination, should be uncontested. But "
www.nytimes.com/2024/11/25/o...
www.nytimes.com/2024/11/25/o...
Comments
glad michelle goldberg is here to lead me on the right path!
On the one side there are people getting upset that they’ve been told they’re bigots.
On the other side there is a group using the full force of the state to drive trans people out of public life entirely.
And the debate is about whether we’re being too mean to the transphobes.
https://glaad.org/new-york-times-sign-on-letter-from-lgtbq-allied-leaders-and-organizations/
The NYT responded by letting them all go.
If your HRT provider was not an MD, your meds got cut off. Most folks were working with nurse practitioners under informed consent models and never did got diagnostic letters from a psych.
If that level got applied to the whole US, that's a disaster
Trying to court their votes makes no more sense than negotiating with rabid squirrels.
They are one and the same.