Honestly, I'm kind of dubious that this is AI at all. I might need to do some forensics on it. But I see no characteristic "AI weirdness" in it. Looks more like photoshop to me. Though it could be a mix of both.
Personally I'm both, but I'm also a tech worker with almost a decade of machine learning experience and this seems accurate to the "AI" available that the moment
I use AI extensively - I know what I'm talking about. To make things that look good, you use a *workflow*, which involves both the AI tool (actually a whole massive toolset) and an editor (Photoshop, GIMP, etc). Some things are much easier in Photoshop, some in AI.
If you need *exact specificity*, and *no glitches*, AI is not going to make your life easier. Glitches can be repaired, both manually and with subsequent passes. Specificity is harder. You can train models, but that takes ages. Best is to sketch or paste in the specific thing and use AI to enhance
I am just happy we all have the time and ability to question the credibility of information and that we all take moments to challenge our beliefs and update our knowledge. It would be trouble if people just assume information provided online is correct with no due diligence!
We need someone in mainstream media to explain to the public in a meaningful (and perhaps viral) way how generative AI is going to accelerate scams, spam, robocalls, and disinformation at a rate that we wont be able to combat.
Explaining how many hours of video is on YouTube to someone lol. We think it's empty but it's not, there's a reason Satoshi have representative PoW, water consumption from GPT, etc. It all adds up in residuals in ways people cannot predict due to the rapidity of expansion.
In a prior life I was a philosophy academic. Plato and Nietzsche were my focus. I have an unfinished parody dialogue called “The Donald”. Part of the problem is how to avoid Socrates just murdering him
What specifically is wrong with this? Genuine question. I know this is related to the Tiananmen Square massacre but I don’t know enough about the historical details to detect what the AI messed up.
AI is going to make Google even less functional and trustworthy than it already is and if you don't understand why that's so exciting then you're just not a tech genius like me.
A couple days ago I googled the three letter acronym of a business that sends scammy presorted mail to countless people. I would have probably gotten the result on the first page two years ago.
I got one result: a Google Maps link that had nothing to do with what I was searching for.
I'm assuming that the AI algorithm, based on absolutely nothing, figured I would only be interested in a small business 20 miles away and not the company which sends mail to people across the country.
I consistently get no relevant results for search terms that I know for certain there are blogs/articles/websites dedicated to. Incredibly frustrating and useless.
I see. Yes, it messes with muscle memory and since it's not actually a different presentation but more of a search filter, it's also conceptually something else and probably ought to be moved elsewhere.
That happened to me and then it went away after a week. It looks like there's a "keep scrolling/searching" option right before the cards start now that lets you stay in a regular Google search.
It's totally horrible, I wish they'd get rid of it entirely to be honest. The cards seem to not offer anything I'm actually looking for and very few things avidly twisted to my searches.
I feel bad cause I looked at it originally and snickered slightly but then I realized the larger implication, this has.
I fucking dispise AI generated images, except the ones that let you see what you might look like with long hair (1/3rd of the reason I'm growing my hair out) but you were saying?
Comments
I mean, "misinformation being mass-shared on the internet" is kind of a long-standing problem.
Only #1 and #3 are actually lithium producers. #2 is the world's largest copper mine. #4 is a copper+cobalt mine.
Like half the images on a Google Search are wrong. We're already in a misinfo dystopia, & most don't care.
https://www.reddit.com/r/midjourney/comments/129pcy8/selfie_tank_man_tiananmen_square_1989/
Intelligence <=> Learning
I'm not sure how you draw a distinction between the two concepts.
I use AI extensively - I know what I'm talking about. To make things that look good, you use a *workflow*, which involves both the AI tool (actually a whole massive toolset) and an editor (Photoshop, GIMP, etc). Some things are much easier in Photoshop, some in AI.
=> He who actively destroys the past intends on repeating it.
One Ring to rule them all, and in the darkness, bind them.
Terrific.
I got one result: a Google Maps link that had nothing to do with what I was searching for.
I fucking dispise AI generated images, except the ones that let you see what you might look like with long hair (1/3rd of the reason I'm growing my hair out) but you were saying?