I've often wondered why we don't invite original authors on replications, especially ones that demonstrate issues with the original papers. It would increase code-sharing, transparency, and lessen the shame of retraction, which would be good for science.
Reposted from
Laura Bronner
But then instead of just writing about how wrong we were (which, to be clear, we absolutely were), Elisabeth, Julia and Sylvia invited us to collaborate - to work together to figure out what we can *actually* learn about voting at 16 in Austria, with better code and much more data.
Comments