If Trump's criminal conviction, delivered by an impartial jury of his peers, is ultimately set aside, it will be due to SCOTUS' flawed immunity decision. The DA clearly doesn't believe that should be the outcome & will oppose it.
Reposted from
Adam Klasfeld
Breaking:
Manhattan DA Bragg intends to OPPOSE Trump's motion to dismiss his New York criminal case, BUTβ
Prosecutor do NOT object to pausing Trump's sentencing, which was scheduled for next week.
Manhattan DA Bragg intends to OPPOSE Trump's motion to dismiss his New York criminal case, BUTβ
Prosecutor do NOT object to pausing Trump's sentencing, which was scheduled for next week.
Comments
We seem to be less a democratic republic than a constitutional monarchy.
Absolutely nobody is standing up to the dictator-in-waiting. Everyone in authority seems to be surrendering without a fight.
Even by those 6 boob's wearing black robes.
Shame.
#DemsMakingGOPMiserable
This si squarely ont he DNC and CopMala-Biden.
It happened
What a country..
They are persistent and very very wealthy$$$.
DEMOCRACY IN CHAINS by NANCY MACLEAN lays it all out.
Failure is not an option.
America is in Peril.π₯
the hope hicks testimony was at best a mere side bar to the side bar of a side bar to the damning evidence that the grand jury heard and proffered the 34 felonies to the da.
Aside from official-acts immunity/evidence exclusion, there are significant issues, such as prejudicial instructional errors, that Judge Merchan can rely on for setting aside the verdict under CPL 330.30. But he may not even decide that issue if he concludes that, as a
#DeclassifyTrump