The New York Times is so blatantly in the tank for Trump.
Calling Canada and Mexico "recalcitrant" is just beyond the pale. It's straight up propaganda.
Calling Canada and Mexico "recalcitrant" is just beyond the pale. It's straight up propaganda.
Comments
And, of course, completely incorrect.
Is this the type of reporting you meant because it seems rather ultra-nationalistic adjacent. That’s the “substance” I’m seeing.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/colombia-deportation-flights-trump-retaliation/
Also "recalcitrant"? What is this 1848? Do they really want to use French Revolution words? Then again, it is February so...
But Peter Baker has a hard on for a trade war, just like Judith Miller had the hots for a war in the Middle East.
Recalcitrant:
(of a person) unwilling to obey orders or to do what should be done, or (of an animal) refusing to be controlled
It’s insane
It's a totally absurd demand. But he said it again this weekend, in writing.
The paper of record has a long history of cheering on the worst leaders & telling us what they are doing isn't THAT bad.
Fuck you, NYT. Fuck you all the way to hell and back.