Indeed, I wrote a whole article about how the abject incompetence of "AI" that exists in the real world means the "AI" of fiction and film has been revealed as optimistic at best, even the murdery ones:
https://www.uncannymagazine.com/article/scalzi-on-film-hollywood-totally-lied-to-us-about-ai-why-cinematic-cyborgs-are-so-much-smarter-than-what-we-have-in-the-real-world/
https://www.uncannymagazine.com/article/scalzi-on-film-hollywood-totally-lied-to-us-about-ai-why-cinematic-cyborgs-are-so-much-smarter-than-what-we-have-in-the-real-world/
Comments
*Buys a mower from Amazon*
*Buys a mower from Amazon*
*Buys a mower from Amazon*
*Buys a mower from Amazon*
*Buys a mower from Amazon*
*Buys a mower from Amazon*
*Buys a mower from Amazon*
*Buys a mower from Amazon*
*Buys a book about ferns*
Do it wrong 10,000 times and get "rewarded" for successes until monkeys banging on a keyboard you get something right.
It would really lower people’s expectations