It gets worse.
DOJ cites to the SCOTUS order, quoting the court as holding that the government should “take all available steps to facilitate the return of Abrego Garcia...”
The problem? SCOTUS never said that!
The quote is actually from Judge Xinis’s amended order following the SCOTUS decision.
DOJ cites to the SCOTUS order, quoting the court as holding that the government should “take all available steps to facilitate the return of Abrego Garcia...”
The problem? SCOTUS never said that!
The quote is actually from Judge Xinis’s amended order following the SCOTUS decision.
Comments
Disbarment is in order.
Why is anyone even entertaining these fucking ghouls?????
Defendants caused confusion, by truncating the contrast with the language of SCOTUS to : “see: [citation]
The truncation was deliberate, to obscure
“Mass” and “achussetts”?
DOJ: “We deny ooperating with significant milace”
Also DOJ: “We affirm encompetency” 😳😂
“Dam u otto erect!”
😂
The others are simply plural.
maybe I should search your posts and highlight what to delete?
Jeez, if you're this touchy about a comment from a total stranger, I wouldn't want to attend your holiday dinners.
which is often quite accurate!
Or they just aren’t the best at their jobs. Bless their baby hearts.
“Futuo Illum ! “
why not both, etc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b0MUMGmEgrI&pp=0gcJCdgAo7VqN5tD