Science is political. It wouldn't necessarily have to be partisan.
But when one party is opposed to science-based policy, scientists have a choice between saying "you're right, thoughts and prayers are probably as effective as reducing carbon emissions" or saying "fuck that."
But when one party is opposed to science-based policy, scientists have a choice between saying "you're right, thoughts and prayers are probably as effective as reducing carbon emissions" or saying "fuck that."
Comments
guess they don't need it anymore.
Scientists are accused of being partisan. I say embrace it.
We're not lying for political reasons. We are defending science as a way of knowing, and as a humanitarian endeavor to help even those groups that are disenfranchised by people in power. If that's partisan so be it.
Science *becomes* political, b/c Science shows us the world is infinitely complex & varied, & full of uncertainty & the unexpected, always evolving.
1/2
Those who cannot process ambiguity, nuance, conditional conclusions, uncertainty, and the words 'we don't know yet🤷♀️' (and resent experts!) Think they can force those things away with state power, making Science political.
Montgomery Scott (Scotty)
what is the maximum difference between two people? almost every race on this planet has had their time under the sun- meaning they all can dominate.
plus, ideas could be one of the unregulated fast track to follow the dodo.
“Embrace our diversity, it’s our very strength in nature that we all exist and depend upon for our lives.”
“If you oppose diversity,you oppose all forms of life itself, including our own.”😔
There is no compromise with them.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QqwZJDEZ9Ng