PASS THIS ON: "US Copyright Office is opening a public comment period around AI and copyright issues beginning AUGUST 30th"
@neilhimself.neilgaiman.com @usmantm.bsky.social @chuckwendig.bsky.social @scalzi.com @astrokatie.com @lkk.bsky.social @okbjgm.bsky.social @wgawest.bsky.social
@neilhimself.neilgaiman.com @usmantm.bsky.social @chuckwendig.bsky.social @scalzi.com @astrokatie.com @lkk.bsky.social @okbjgm.bsky.social @wgawest.bsky.social
Comments
Or does this have to do with ChatGPT being trained on copywritten works?
SOME supervised output is copyrightable, IF it is created as an expression of human creativity (a requirement for meeting the bar for "creative height").
There's no clear definition of what kind of human influence is needed, or how much
"The US Copyright Office will consider an AI-generated work copyrightable if a human can prove they themselves put a meaningful amount of creative effort into the final content, according to a policy published on Thursday"
The Copyright Office denied the application on the ground that the work lacked human authorship which, in the view of the Register of Copyrights, is a prerequisite to obtaining a copyright."