imagine lecturing people on free speech and then doing this - ThreadSky

pickardje.bsky.social • 8 days ago

imagine lecturing people on free speech and then doing this

Comments

hablett.bsky.social•8 days ago

Just noticed the ‘retruth’ function now there 😧

jmclaren.bsky.social•8 days ago

Well, it’s freedom to have the same speech as they do. It’s that sort of freedom.

pawprints630.bsky.social•8 days ago

it's apparently only free if it applies to criticizing and protesting against someone else

danielleturney1.bsky.social•8 days ago

Logic took a quick swerve round this and carried on running

patrick.seurre.com•7 days ago

So... Jan 6th *wasn't* an illegal protest?

ramalina.bsky.social•8 days ago

MAGA forcing the colleges to suppress protests for them.

dwazou.bsky.social•8 days ago

There is a case to be made that some protests went too far.

But Trump's behavior is outrageous.

rob987.bsky.social•8 days ago

Too far? Like the one one Jan 6th. Remind me, how did Trump treat them?

dwazou.bsky.social•8 days ago

I completely despise Donald Trump and his MAGA thugs

But two wrongs don't make a right.

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/columbia-university-president-says-negotiations-protesters-stalled-sch-rcna149755

rob987.bsky.social•8 days ago

Looks a lot tamer than the behaviour he pardoned. It isn’t a case of two wrongs. Because clearly it’s been decided that one isn’t wrong. Wonder why.

blimpyb0y.bsky.social•8 days ago

Genuine q from someone who hasn’t followed this: which protests went too far and how?

dwazou.bsky.social•8 days ago

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/columbia-university-president-says-negotiations-protesters-stalled-sch-rcna149755

sueryan66bskysocia.bsky.social•8 days ago

It’s quite something.

riseagain26.bsky.social•8 days ago

Looks like time to go back to school!

offcentre.bsky.social•8 days ago

What makes a protest 'illegal' in the US?

jw-here.bsky.social•8 days ago

er... the whim of felonious trump / agent krasknob

pendorpaul.bsky.social•8 days ago

“Thank you for your attention on this matter” 😂😂 who the fuck does he think he is? Snowball?

petertelford.bsky.social•8 days ago

I guess he doesn’t know this is a direct assault on the 1st amendment? Just thinks he can enact law by tweet. That will end well.

jw-here.bsky.social•8 days ago

and so far his other illegal or anti-constitutional behaviour has had what consequences?

petertelford.bsky.social•7 days ago

Executive orders stayed by Federal judges.

However, democracies can’t function like that indefinitely, so I suggest the members of congress and states get a plan together.

billybeans.bsky.social•8 days ago

Another hissy fit from the child in chief.

joderella.bsky.social•8 days ago

Such a weird way to sign off a stupidly threatening message. Like it's a routine request

lankester.bsky.social•8 days ago

Those students will be the ones ending up in the vast camps they are building for “illegal immigrants.” By summer they will be housing US citizen activists.

Time for Starmer to welcome those students to UK universities. We could do with the boost. Finish their degrees here with transfer credits.

Posting Rules

Be respectful to others
No spam or self-promotion
Stay on topic
Follow Bluesky's terms of service

Comments

Posting Rules

Reply