adamlevitt.bsky.social
Photographer, writer, bike mechanic, voice over actor. Lover of the outdoors, proper music nerd. Squamish, BC, Canada. Extremely addicted to Manchester United 🇾🇪🇾🇪🇾🇪#GlazersOut
1,945 posts
1,132 followers
833 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
The only reason to let him back into Old Trafford would be to get him to dig up and remove the hyena his brother buried there and thus end the curse. 😉
comment in response to
post
I still don’t understand why it wasn’t a second yellow? I thought diving was always bookable offense?
comment in response to
post
Logic would dictate that but we all know how inconsistent the PGMOL is. There doesn’t seem to be any rhyme or reason of what constitutes a penalty these days.
comment in response to
post
It has to cause total uncertainty for the defenders. How are they supposed to know where the ball will end up? Look at that Maddison goal last week. Sure, DeLigt and Dalot could have reacted faster but the ball shouldn’t have ended up in that position.
comment in response to
post
comment in response to
post
Maybe he needs a cuddle? 😂
comment in response to
post
I’ve been thinking about the 2nd goal more and there’s no way that’s the shape Amorim wants for his back 3. There’s way too much space between DeLigt, Maguire & Maz. Yes, Case gives the ball away in a bad position but I would think we need to be way more compact.
comment in response to
post
That’s why it penalty was in parentheses. 😉
comment in response to
post
Agreed. It has to make the back line so unsure. It like they never know what to expect with him.
comment in response to
post
I think there’s a few flaws in his fundamentals of goal keeping. He constantly parries the ball back into danger zones. He doesn’t read the flight of crosses very well either.
comment in response to
post
I kind of want to take it all in and try to analyze what exactly is going wrong. Knowing the result takes any emotion out of it.
comment in response to
post
Birdshit.
comment in response to
post
Wow. Thats severe self restraint.
comment in response to
post
This is a bit of a non-story. I believe this clause was in place when Ineos acquired their shares? Clickbait headline nonsense as per usual.
comment in response to
post
Hasn’t there been a policy in this place for years?
comment in response to
post
Fortunately or unfortunately, no bottles were harmed and no epic earthquake-liquor store footage was captured.
comment in response to
post
That spiced up an otherwise dull and rainy afternoon.
comment in response to
post
Yep, I was in the liquor store and the bottles were rattling around.
comment in response to
post
It was. Felt it good in Valleycliffe.
comment in response to
post
I’m still not sure what it even is and how to properly use it.
comment in response to
post
Fantastic news! Congrats.
comment in response to
post
🤔
comment in response to
post
comment in response to
post
Cheers, mate.
comment in response to
post
Link?
comment in response to
post
He’s going to be all right.