Profile avatar
alyraejepsen.bsky.social
sycophantic prophetic Socratic junkie wannabe | belongs to @femiurge.bsky.social
107 posts 99 followers 52 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter

I'm sorry for raining on this parade, but the "transgender mice" talking point is bullshit, but not because someone mistook "transgenic" for "transgender." The blog post that kicked it off (from a partisan bullshit website) listed a number of papers testing the effects of sex hormones on animals.

Secret Facts about bottom surgery the Trans Cabal Won’t Tell You: it hurt owie

Love to know that the paper of record thinks that the US Government launching a full-on assault on a minority community, to the point of outright saying said community does not exist, is inconsequential

“Little Nicky: As good as Citizen Kane” - Google reviews

every day trans people wake up and suffer the humiliation of having to fight for our human rights under the banner of a flag that looks like we got it at babies-r-us

it sounds funny and ridiculous because it is, but this is about as explicit as "scapegoating a minority group for the nation's economic decline" gets

i will be the proud first lady of transgender

hello i am a new york times reporter and I am envisioning a future in which a) the US forcibly annexes their closest ally, and b) the leader of the US lets the annexed people vote him out i am very smart

democrats won’t admit it, but my family’s economic outlook has gotten a LOT better since Trump took office. but what do i know? i don’t have a fancy economics degree, i’m just a regular guy who runs an airplane scrapyard

unpopular opinion but this article is good. It’s doing the exact opposite of the usual reactionary centrist two-step - it points out a criticism the right has of the left, gives it a cursory “to be sure”, and spends the rest of the article pointing out how it applies to the right!

on tiktok and seeing Kat Blaque of all people getting called a transmedicalist are we being for real

i wrote about the NYT's latest op-ed on birthright citizenship: why it's stupid, and why its implications are bigger than one clause

Invincible s3 is PRO DOGE

invincible s3e2 spoilers: #TeamCecil

the average american would rather live in fascist italy than see one (1) homeless person

the biggest problem in modern politics is the assumption that Your Group in particular is always the aggrieved and unlistened-to party in every conversation, and if you think you’re immune to that assumption you’re part of the problem

not lost on me that their Just Asking Questions stuff got sent out with a push notification and this didn’t

this is kind of my problem with this whole site tbh we can’t just ignore what’s going on, if this is to be a platform worth anything it can’t be dedicated to plugging our fingers in our ears

saying compulsory homosexuality is real because of trans women is like saying misandry is real because of trans men

no, "Compulsory Homosexuality" isnt a thing for trans women 🧵 to begin with, let's look at why one might think it is. yes, a lot of bi trans women didn't date men until transitioning because transition let them become more comfortable in their own selves & sexuality. this happened to me, for one.

i spend very little time on bsky but from what I can gather it has a terminal case of “let men be masculine” brain

aly theyfab arc

assigned cis by bluesky