arielob.bsky.social
Applied econ & policy prof at Cornell. Researching how people cope w/ environmental change. Posts about climate, agriculture, environment & academia.
https://arielortizbobea.github.io
211 posts
8,854 followers
480 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
5/ With this in mind, write those parts of the paper for that specific audience in mind and do not assume that people will have the time/energy/interest to go deeper.
This also implies that papers will feel somewhat repetitive. That is a normal feature of long paper, not a bad thing.
comment in response to
post
4/ I would say that most of the people seeing your work are in groups 1-2, read title and abstract.
comment in response to
post
3/ Why is this efficient for communicating?
Because you can reach different audiences.
Browsers read the title; Skimmers read the abstract; Interested folks read the intro; Your professional crowd reads the paper; Only the hard core reads the paper+appendix.
comment in response to
post
2/ This analogy highlights that the essential parts of a paper should be reflected at each level.
In the image above you should recognize it's a cat by looking at the smallest doll. You don't need to look further to get the gist.
If you want more, then you go to the next doll in size, etc.
comment in response to
post
We are entering the era when these are no longer just dumb takes on social media
comment in response to
post
Sigh
comment in response to
post
we need a "sight" button
comment in response to
post
Cool chapter. Have not looked very closely but have you considered including 1- aspects regarding spatial nature of unobservables/uncertainty and how to deal with it, and 2- considerations regarding publication outlets to target based on question/style of paper. Thanks for putting this together.
comment in response to
post
Congratulations!!! đžđ
comment in response to
post
Around the same time reviewer went to grad school? Itâs a time itâs easy to make disproportionate difference estimations between what came before and what lies ahead.
comment in response to
post
Corollary: degree of hand waving
comment in response to
post
This may just be revealing when the referee went to grad school
comment in response to
post
In these divisive times Iâm glad folks remain unaware of the deep chasm tearing apart academic economists đ
comment in response to
post
By âacademic offerâ I mean âresearch offerâ, RFF being a non partisan think tank. You get the point.
comment in response to
post
I donât think I was their first choice given the timing of the offer⌠but it changed my trajectory. I often think of Molly Macauley (RIP) who ultimately took a chance on me.
comment in response to
post
Postdocs were rare 10 years ago, so it was difficult to get a bit âmore runwayâ. And we only had Ph.D. funding for 4 years. Had to work part time the 5th year as a consultant at the world bank to support myself. I could not have pushed for another year to stay in academia as a foreign student.
comment in response to
post
I wish someone did that. Thx for the product.
comment in response to
post
Any plans to incorporate other experiments beyond SSPs? Eg say the âhist-natâ experiment w/o human forcing?
comment in response to
post
Thatâs the place
comment in response to
post
Me neither until one wrote to me looking for an RAship (!)
comment in response to
post
Do you kill the bad guys?
comment in response to
post
I was not expecting the âclimate whisperer of Blueskyâ đ
comment in response to
post
Bootstrapped history
comment in response to
post
Nice shot! Looks like the pedestrian bridge viewed from lake st. Yes, doing a bit better. Hope you enjoyed the visit!