bombchill.bsky.social
I am here to use this site as an outlet to rant about Trump and those like him.
73 posts
22 followers
5 following
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
Why wait to be a bird to do it?
comment in response to
post
Out of curiosity I must ask if they are also planning to privatize over things like the postal service, cause that's what Trump is considering.
comment in response to
post
A blue state. That's all I will say about it though. Don't wanna give out my personal info. I doubt there would be a civil war today though.
comment in response to
post
Yeh. I'm honesty begining to think about secession. I mean, it's already horrifying the way it is. With Trump at the wheel... I'm sure no nightmare is dark enough to describe it.
comment in response to
post
Privatizing health care does nothing to help anyone but the rich elite. Here in the US the proof of that is everywhere. And with Trump returning its only going to get worse. I hope your country takes a hint of what NOT to do.
comment in response to
post
I'm pretty sure if we did that though, it would be seen by the South Africans as an act of war.
comment in response to
post
I wanna say I would be surprised if he did this... But I also don't wanna lie.
comment in response to
post
Politicians tend to be either corrupt or incompetent, if not both.
comment in response to
post
That's true as well. But the few who are not as corrupt who could potentially do something about it tend to be brainless or spineless.
comment in response to
post
And I imagine that if anything that the lesson his class will learn from it is "These lower class people are savage beasts, we better get better security to stop these animals!" or something equally as disgusting and classist. This will not make them learn to appreciate the lower class.
comment in response to
post
No. We have to deal with these people but just killing them is not the way to do it. We need to do things like use legislation to bring down their businesses (and I'm sure if our politicians could just think creatively for once they could do it on there own).
comment in response to
post
Didn't start I mean...
comment in response to
post
Saying not saving I mean.
comment in response to
post
Ehem. "do that stuff! You can" is what I meant.
comment in response to
post
As for the people, I think you greatly overestimate the intelligence of people here in the US. Especially when so many prefer this system to a universal healthcare system.
comment in response to
post
Well, in the case of the companies, I sure wouldn't put it past them to do something like that. Companies do shady things like that all the time to make them look better and then take it away when they get what they really want.
comment in response to
post
No really. I'm asking if your saving the companies wouldn't try that or that the people wouldn't view them as better?
comment in response to
post
It may have had an effect, but not a particularly good effect. I'm sure they will continue to be just as corrupt, just with more guards.
comment in response to
post
Can you give a little context? Who are you talking about the people or the companies when you say no body?
comment in response to
post
I deleted my post because I wasn't happy about the way I stated it. I posted a new post addressing the same. They may take down their CEO's pictures, but I doubt that, they will be any less corrupt. They will probably just continue doing everything they do now with more protection.
comment in response to
post
And if it was, let's be real here. They did it so they would look like heros in wake of the events "We don't do that! stuff you can trust us!" I'm sure they'll reinstate it later if that's why they backtracked. They did that to take advantage of the situation. Not for the people.
comment in response to
post
I have doubts that was caused by the CEO shooting. More likely just from backlash.
comment in response to
post
Also it don't start America talking about the unfair distribution of wealth. That was already going on and this doesn't seam to have done anything boost it.
comment in response to
post
And what has it accomplished? This isn't a military insurgence group where taking out the leader destabilizes the entire thing. Nothing will get better from his death. They'll put in a new equally corrupt CEO and things will just go on the way they always have.
comment in response to
post
I'm not against violent revolution against fascism if necessary, in fact it's seemingly becoming more and more necessary each day to me. But this one CEO's death will do nothing to obstruct fascism. Save your ammunition for the political leaders if it comes to that.
comment in response to
post
If we loose that then we risk looking (or even becoming) just as bad as our opponents. And that's not something we can afford.
comment in response to
post
It's important that we do not fall off our position at the high ground. It will give them a gift to use against us if we do. They will say, "Look at them advocating for murder. Do you trust them?" Being morally superior is one of the best weapons we have. People will tend to side with such people.
comment in response to
post
Violence is not acceptable either way, unless absolutely necessary. It can be morally just but only if it's needed. As I have said, his death will bring no change and as such isn't necessary and thus not just.
comment in response to
post
There are better ways to deal with this sort of thing that don't involve stepping down to violence. Ways that could actually have a real effect on the root cause.
comment in response to
post
Look he seems like a terrible person, I get it. But his death will change nothing. Whatever evil he would have carried out will inevitably be carried out just as much by his successor. His death will do no one good.
comment in response to
post
Assassination should only be done out of dire need. Their was no dire need for him to die and his death will change nothing but who's exploiting people. People will still be just as exploited by the company under new management.
comment in response to
post
Assassination should only be done out of dire need. Their was no dire need for him to die and his death will change nothing but who's exploiting people. People will still be just as exploited by the company under new management.
comment in response to
post
Assassination should only be done out of dire need. Their was no dire need for him to die and his death will change nothing but who's exploiting people. People will still be just as exploited by the company under new management.
comment in response to
post
What good did that do? Now someone else will take his place that will be just as corrupt. I'm sure that the CEO was a corrupt evil individual, but killing him like this isn't right either.
comment in response to
post
What really worries me about this is that they will probably consider anything opposing Trump to be woke. Having a military full of Trump worshiping people is a terrifying thought.
comment in response to
post
So wholesome... A nice change of pace...
comment in response to
post
I wanna put my opinion in the mix but you already said it.
comment in response to
post
Dude, I get your anger but your words are beyond extreme. Violence should always be the last option. Your way of thinking is dangerous.
comment in response to
post
Why are we so upset with the queen here? She had nothing to do with anything other than being a mascot of the UK. She had no say in anything that they did. The health insurance guy I can get the anger for, but encouraging violence like that is just wrong.
comment in response to
post
Ya... Vance sucks.
comment in response to
post
It's terrifying to be in a country with him. Let alone with him as FBI director.
comment in response to
post
Trump makes MTG's national divorce go from nonsense to a very appealing idea.
comment in response to
post
Obviously both make me sick to my stomach, but I'd take Musk as president over Trump. Trump makes me consider the prospect of my state leaving the union.
comment in response to
post
To put it into prospective, Trump's election has made me start following the California national party (I used to think those guys were nuts). Had Elon been elected president (even though he's not American) I'd probably just rant for the next 4 years.
comment in response to
post
I want him to leave my side... Now would be a good time.
comment in response to
post
We in America don't need our Elon Musk Either. No one needs any more Elon Musk. We need less. Maybe -50000.