Profile avatar
bookofoak.bsky.social
Soft for Izzy Hands and Astarion Fannish, academic, progressive She/they šŸ³ļøā€āš§ļø Fortyish Profile pic by Queer Magneto
2,998 posts 860 followers 1,635 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to post
We’re not complaining about the article, we’re complaining about the post promoting putting both miasma theory and germ theory in quotes, suggesting that they are both equally dodgy.
comment in response to post
I’ve marched better myself at a JROTC lineup and I once fainted in formation
comment in response to post
Sympathies from someone tagged as a Reagan lover because I support strict gun control measures
comment in response to post
If 95% of their audience failed to see the satire in those examples, then yes. Satire is a genuinely difficult thing to do!
comment in response to post
one may or may not like what comes after america but it’s damn sure to involve a lot of politics still.
comment in response to post
ā€œwaiting for the system to collapseā€. so you’re doing nothing and acting superior about it.
comment in response to post
I thought about it! Just couldn’t quite make the joke work. 😭
comment in response to post
Thanks! It will go well with another favorite of mine: ā€œyou aren’t going to like this, but the fix is electing *more* Democrats.ā€
comment in response to post
Oooh, have fun - Oslo sounds amazing! And all power to your mom!
comment in response to post
Oooh, that’s good. Mind if I steal it?
comment in response to post
Turns out you DO need a broad popular front to get things done! Who woulda thunk it. (Also stay safe if you are protesting tomorrow!)
comment in response to post
And yet when you ask how many Communist Senators the left has gotten elected, the deflections are relentless
comment in response to post
Even without punching, there’s often no attempt to find common ground: e.g., I told a leftist I was arguing with that I did agree with their post that ā€œprotest is a practiceā€ and was told I did not!
comment in response to post
the son just breaks my heart. they got someone who was almost literally a child killed for absolutely nothing.
comment in response to post
we do agree that protest is practice though. stay safe tomorrow!
comment in response to post
always with the sarcasm, never with the solutions. tale as old as time.
comment in response to post
there’s one person who has advocated for an actual solution here and it ain’t you.
comment in response to post
Exactly! If something is meant as satire, and a whole lot of people don’t view it as satire, then the creator has failed in conveying their meaning. Why the failure occurred might be interesting in a ā€œsatire died when Kissinger won the Nobel Peace Prizeā€ way, but it’s still a failure.
comment in response to post
ā€˜ol janey texas is a tough one, for sure. (psst, the name of the author is Jane *Austen*)
comment in response to post
ā€œThe letter is just red, okay?ā€ - Nathanial Hawthorne
comment in response to post
READ THEORY: www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?t...
comment in response to post
comment in response to post
šŸ¤·ā€ā™€ļø doesn’t mean it’s not true
comment in response to post
then the GOP pedocons thank you for your assist!
comment in response to post
šŸ˜‚ while a hymn of the unionist rises triumphantly!
comment in response to post
Agree that there has been a lack of effective opposition from the Dem leadership in particular. The voting for Trump nominees is one thing (Trump still got the most horrible people confirmed even when all Dems opposed them), but giving up the govt shutdown leverage is sheer political malpractice.
comment in response to post
This one then celebrates both the agreement and the rare internet civility!
comment in response to post
I will also concede that ā€œshut the fuck upā€ was unnecessarily hostile. My explanation (not an excuse) is years of experience listening to online leftists tear down Dem candidates in general elections, particularly amplified when the Dem candidate is a woman.
comment in response to post
Shall we both we agree to use ā€œoneā€ instead? You can say ā€œone needs to primary Dems who suck verilyā€ and I can reply ā€œindeed! however then one needs to be a bulwark for the victor, yea, even if that Dem sucketh the mostā€
comment in response to post
I mean, you specifically also used ā€œyouā€ to reply to me without knowing my views on the value of primarying ineffective Dems and electing the most progressive Dems possible
comment in response to post
Fair enough, though ā€œyouā€ as a designation for a member of a group in discussion (in this case, people who sneer at liberals) is a common shorthand. Also, the OP didn’t ask why people hate on Dems, he suggested that those whose sneer at liberals reflect why they sound like Limbaugh.