bpesq.bsky.social
38 posts
43 followers
286 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
I thought this said baclava and I had questions
comment in response to
post
That’s the best move
comment in response to
post
My old firm had us in 5 days a week starting in June of 2020. Suffice it to say I got covid at least 4 times between then and when I left earlier this year.
comment in response to
post
… doesn’t that mean you had your daughters in your late 30’s early 40’s?
comment in response to
post
Hot boys have ibs
comment in response to
post
I would like to ban retractable leashes.
comment in response to
post
Yes.
comment in response to
post
comment in response to
post
Then why are you wearing a toga?
comment in response to
post
This is the way
comment in response to
post
🫠
comment in response to
post
/8 But “I am going to talk to them to explain and clear this up” is insanity on the level of “I am going to douse myself with lighter fluid and set myself on fire to take care of these grass stains on my jeans.”
SAY YOU DON’T WANT TO TALK AND YOU WANT A LAWYER, THEN SHUT YOUR MOUTH.
comment in response to
post
/7 Moreover, to repeat, it is essential you actually say “I do not want to talk to you, I want to talk to a lawyer,” or words as close to that as possible. Thanks to “conservatives” on the Supreme Court they are allowed to coerce you into talking unless you use something close to those magic words.
comment in response to
post
/6 They will bully you and try to coerce you and make you FEEL like maybe they will arrest you unless you talk. That’s because they are bad faith actors. DO NOT TRUST THEM. DO NOT TALK TO THEM.
comment in response to
post
/5 It is EXTREMELY unlikely that your invocation of your rights will be the tipping point in arresting or charging you. It is even more EXTREMELY unlikely that if they are prepared to arrest or charge that you talking will be the thing that stops them.
THEY WANT YOU TO INCRIMINATE YOURSELF.
comment in response to
post
/4 “But if I refuse to talk will they arrest me or charge me?” That’s what they want you to think to coerce you into talking even against your interests. But it’s a stupid way to think about it. It’s the equivalent of “but if I wear a seat belt, what if I drive into a lake and am trapped?”
comment in response to
post
/3 Let me repeat that: “I don’t want to talk to you. I want to talk to a lawyer.”
In all other respects, shut the fuck up. Don’t engage them. Don’t let them engage you. They are not trying to help you. They are not trying to “clear this up.” Shut. Your. Fucking. Mouth.
comment in response to
post
/2 Do not respond to the voicemail message, the email, the text, the card left on your door. Talk to a lawyer, or just don’t respond at all.
If they reach you by phone, or confront you in person, you may say “I don’t want to talk to you. I want to talk to a lawyer.”
comment in response to
post
Thanks, Buttpee
comment in response to
post
But it took me 12 minutes
comment in response to
post
Just @ me next time
comment in response to
post
Okay, so like Thursday?
comment in response to
post
Can you have a pub sub for me
comment in response to
post
/12 The story has gone hugely viral, in the news across the country. Great. But my favorite is a small local paper in Ohio just going “that’s bullshit, they can’t do that” and republishing the banned editorial.
sciotovalleyguardian.com/2025/02/19/a...
comment in response to
post
Yes, he was using the magnets tiny trumpet was talking about.
comment in response to
post
That’s honestly a ringing endorsement of the culture. I would mention that to people interviewing 🤣
comment in response to
post
Omfg nightmare fuel