caiggas.bsky.social
He/Him
Woke is a compliment
Sysadmin, Programmer, Gamedev
Skeptic, Humanist, Atheist, Leftist
47 posts
19 followers
25 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
Anti Zionism is not anti semitism.
You are not being oppressed or discriminated against when people critique the bad actions of the Israeli government.
comment in response to
post
Some of the best games are reasonably small. Rimworld is under a gig. CDDA is under 200 mBs last I checked. Dwarf fortress (especially OG versions) is pretty small.
comment in response to
post
Oh, and you still need to show that such support has anything at all to do with Atheism or "Wokeism".
comment in response to
post
Unrelated, but if my wording of things appears weird, its probably because I keep having to retype things to try to get them to fit in the character limit. This isn't a very good environment for debate.
I do want to thank you for your reasonable discussion with me so far. You've been very civil.
comment in response to
post
Not quite, but almost. You need the atheist college kids to be aware of the oven babies and explicitly support that specific action. I may be extrapolating too much, but I'd bet that you are taking general support of Hamas (or Palestinians in general) and calling it support for the evil actions.
comment in response to
post
Assuming that you're not just making this up and that it's a real series of interviews or something, then it seems to me that you have taken some video and extrapolated a whole world of you that you've applied to all "woke atheists". Maybe develop some basic information processing capacity.
comment in response to
post
Also, I'd like a citation on that atheist college kids supporting oven babies. If such a thing is even real, then I would be glad to call that monstrous. For context, I am both an atheist and proudly "woke". Consider the term, given the definition I supplied, to be a compliment.
comment in response to
post
My understanding of Woke is roughly "being aware of systemic injustice or inequalities and wanting to correct them". There are probably more nuanced and better definitions, but inside of the constraints of a single message that is good enough.
That is also utterly incompatible with oven babies.
comment in response to
post
What is Wokeism. Also, you still haven't answered my original question. What is this babies in ovens thing and what does it have to do with this Wokeism thing?
I ask because the only definition I am aware of for "Woke" is entirely incompatible with harming anyone.
comment in response to
post
Atheism doesn't have anything to do with being "Woke" either.
ANY position other than "God(s) exist" is possible within the stance of atheism.
Again though, what the fuck are you talking about? Who is supporting unaliving babies in ovens? What does that have to do with "Woke"?
comment in response to
post
First of all, what the fuck are you talking about. Second, atheism doesn't include a moral framework or any kind of unified ideological framework. Atheism is simply one of the positions in regards to the Theism claim.
comment in response to
post
Based as fuck
comment in response to
post
🚫CANCEL AMAZON🚫
Give your money to local vendors.
Thrift stores.
Barter with neighbors.
Don't give any more money to the capitalist oligarchy if you can.
Or where you can cut back.
Start a garden.
This is the strongest way to resist.
Stop giving them money.
Keep speaking out against lies.
comment in response to
post
I don't know if I'm making much sense. The 300 character limit is making this difficult.
comment in response to
post
My second to last sentence doesn't fit well. Sorry.
The point I was trying to make is that whether or not the reality we experience is somehow fundamental, we are stuck dealing with it and we can do so while being informed by the laws of logic and physics that it consistently follows.
comment in response to
post
Whether the reality you experience is somehow "fundamental" or "base" doesn't matter. You experience A reality and you are stuck dealing with it. The reality we experience consistently follows certain patterns of behavior. So work with what you have and leave the solipsism behind. It's not useful.
comment in response to
post
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I was under the impression that the technology that drives blue sky doesn't even leave the capability for private accounts. The same systems that make it near-impossible to centraly control also make it impossible to privatize.
comment in response to
post
If you were an NPC:
comment in response to
post
What kind of laptop is it? Depending on what type, you very well may be able to replace it yourself. It can't get any more broken. I can probably give you advice and even find a good source for a new one.
comment in response to
post
You said in another comment thread here that it's a damaged screen. $450 is an absolute travesty. The labor depends on the model, but anything over parts +$100 is highway robbery.
Source: I've repaired laptops for years. I have replaced, no exaggeration, over 1000 laptop screens in my career.
comment in response to
post
Womp Womp
comment in response to
post
This looks like a lot of fun!
comment in response to
post
Excellent loop!
comment in response to
post
Oh and good luck. I love to see the work of other indie developers.
comment in response to
post
I do not know your current implementation, but maybe have a raycast straight down (or some other check to determine what you are standing on) and disable the interact system for the object you are on. You could add a boolean to each object if you wanted to have exceptions.
comment in response to
post
This does get a little bit hairy though once you take an account that there is no objective frame of reference for motion. That is a bit too complex to go into in this format though. I was just being pedantic and pointing out that your perceived tautology was not a tautology.
comment in response to
post
The thing which is stationary moves through time but not through space. Anything with a zero rest mass moves through space without moving through time.
comment in response to
post
No it's not. Time is not the same thing as space. They are both components of space-time, yes. But that's like saying the x-axis is the same thing as the y-axis.
A thing can move through time without moving through space, or it can move through space without moving through time.
comment in response to
post
There are plenty of GDC talks at that length. Check out their YouTube page.