daveymg1975.bsky.social
38 posts
25 followers
18 following
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
And the Dems once again vote more heavily vote by mail, especially after COVID. Stop starting from a conclusion and trying to work back.
comment in response to
post
I saw it. As stated IT MEANS NOTHING. As bad as the 2000 mules stuff where they "proved" someone with a mobile phone walked past a polling station, maybe given the inaccuracies of triangulation, in the next street. A van was seen outside a polling station?! GET A GRIP.
comment in response to
post
What's that supposed to prove?
comment in response to
post
If they do, and they have as little evidence as you, they will be laughed out of court,AGAIN, even with Trump's petty arm-twisting. The De Souza stuff was ridiculous enough to anyone with the slightest technical knowledge or common sense, but this ...
comment in response to
post
It’s completely equivocal. I’ve just pointed out some rather obvious flaws right now. No one is ever going to stop laughing. Have some self respect
comment in response to
post
But they didn’t vote did they? Because he’s an idiot, a fraud and the worst traitor the English-speaking world has seen in the last thousand years. Plus petty. And I’m not a Democrat. It’s just obvious bullshit.
comment in response to
post
This is exactly the same level of “evidence” we’ve seen for the last four+ years. You’re just going to have to accept you’ve been conned like anyone else in contact with Trump for decades before he was even in politics. Doesn’t even believe it himself. Hence insurrection to stay out of prison.
comment in response to
post
The evidence is not "unequivocal". So far it's been pure fantasy or a complete inability to work out how voting systems work. Which is why it keeps getting laughed out of court. It's not the 60's. No one is handing out stacks of ballots. The
comment in response to
post
Nobody is talking about having the voting machines. They're talking about the bullet ballot results which were sent over Starlink. Elon's practically gloating by talking about MITM attacks. Needs a hand recount. Also there's the c
Voter suppression - a vote suppressed is a vote for the opponent.
comment in response to
post
Which on it's own means nothing, unless you can prove any tampering. This is the same kind of circumstantial bullshit that got thrown out about 40 times before.
comment in response to
post
Hiding what? You’ve provided no evidence. “It could have happened” is not the same thing. If you cared that much about integrity you’d be investigating Starlink. But you aren’t and you don’t.
comment in response to
post
That’s because it doesn’t say what you appear to think it does. It says that ballots were sent by mail, not that there is evidence of tampering. You are also ignoring flagrant vote denial. Repubs have a history of it. Dems don’t.
comment in response to
post
All well within the margin of both victory and human error. Give it up.
comment in response to
post
Well yes. Something so vast would be very difficult to hide, given that there are only just under 9 million registered voters in Pennsylvania. Stop being an idiot.
comment in response to
post
After innumerable frivolous lawsuits and hostile hand recounts that turned up almost exactly the vote machine tallies, no. It's about as likely as invasion from the planet Zartog at this point.
comment in response to
post
I'm saying if 3 rogue votes tripped off alarms 650,000 definitely would not pass unnoticed.
comment in response to
post
You haven't done one yet. From what I can tell, the only proven fraud was a deputy who got caught attempting to create fake military ballots for an election conspiracy theorist. There's a chain of custody for ballots, no one fixes elections these days by shipping piles of them about, let alone 650K.
comment in response to
post
That means nothing. You can't just "print ballots" and get them accepted, they need to tally with the register of voters. Try again.
comment in response to
post
Now you're not even making sense.
comment in response to
post
You have no idea, nothing to say and obnoxiously play the big "I am" based on ... making posters? No one is impressed. Go and play in the traffic.
comment in response to
post
Once again you literaaly have no idea, and nor could you. Grow up and stop the feeble attempts at agent provocateur. You are full of shit.
comment in response to
post
"The Gang That Shot Itself Directly In The Balls".
comment in response to
post
You literally don't know what you're talkking about. You are a troll, a fool or likely both. Go away.
comment in response to
post
Well, no dog bites - faced off quite a few horses but no dog bites - but I've done my bit. I don't see the projection except you complaining about people posting on Bluesky whilst ... posting on Bluesky. Seen a few aggressive idiots a.k.a. obvious ringers too.
Calm down and stop insulting people.
comment in response to
post
What are you talking about? How do you know you are NOT talking to activists, while you yourself are posting on Bluesky? Self-awareness is not your forte.
comment in response to
post
What are you talking about? Disenfranchising voters is not "integrity".
If you have any actual evidence of anyone else cheating please produce it. So far we've only learned that you don't have any at all but weally, weally *sob* *sniff* want it to be true. Grow up.
comment in response to
post
Vote suppression IS a method of stealing elections you turnip.
comment in response to
post
I've thought the same. I bet the insurance will fail to pay out though if they can claim it's "terrorism".
comment in response to
post
Seems pretty popular in Australia. I was browsing in JB Hifi a couple of days ago and noticed it on the rack, in 4K no less, so someone still remembers it at least (I went for Darkman instead - maybe next time).
comment in response to
post
These are the people who declare "the adults are back in charge" every time they get into power, and then proceed to fuck up at everything sideways because they don't know what they're doing.
comment in response to
post
It's like COVID. He's like a two year old. If he can't see it it doesn't exist.
comment in response to
post
“Filtration camps”
comment in response to
post
Nice. Where did you find those?
comment in response to
post
Could he kiss arse any more? The guy does kick-boxing. Does he try to lull his opponents with soothing rectal tongue massages?
comment in response to
post
I bought a packet of gummy Dinosaurs earlier and now I have the Was Not Was song stuck in my head
comment in response to
post
They always told me I’d get flashbacks eventually.
comment in response to
post
They’re always like that. Bad losers. Bad winners
comment in response to
post
“You have delighted us quite enough” - Jane Austen