Profile avatar
david.lynch.wtf
Software engineer at the Wikimedia Foundation. I'm not the director. OR AM I? (I'm not.) I do make a bunch of WoW addons, though. That’s probably a point of divergence. This account is very much my own opinions. (he/him)
910 posts 419 followers 205 following
Prolific Poster
Conversation Starter

they need to do one of those Obama anger translator skits where Brad stands behind Zohran and goes ripshit on Cuomo et al after every friendly pronouncement

Via "One First," my longer take on #SCOTUS's ruling in the birthright citizenship cases. TL;DR: The short-term significance may well be blunted by the answers to two procedural Qs the Court didn't address. It's the broader implication (the death of the legal process school) that's especially grim:

Turtle Mutual Aid:

I simply do not understand the “but they’ll pack it back” objections in what world is one where both sides pack it back and forth worse than what we have now, in which we are 6-3 for “laws are only real if they help Republicans”? packing the court is the only viable response if we want rule of law

I mean, if everything is going in the shitter, there’s no reason to have anti-gay people have all the fun; start making religious objections to all sorts of stuff. The Ten Commandments getting put into class all over, for instance. That’s at least 40% religious orthodoxy.

all of the Supreme Court’s jurisprudence about executive power - all of it - can be replaced with a simple flow chart. is the president a Republican? if so it’s ok. if not, it’s presumptively not ok.

As a constitutional originalist, I do not think that judges should be allowed to issue nationwide injunctions against executive orders orders. But when we have a Democratic president again, I will probably change my mind about all of this.

I want to hear more things like this. Who are the lawyers who can offer tangible ways that people can fight back?

I'm not sure this nickname will have the impact they think it will

The American Academy of Pediatricians bluntly telling us the current CDC can't be trusted, and of course they are absolutely correct publications.aap.org/aapnews/news...

I wrote about Clarence Thomas's anti-intellectual, anti-trans concurrence in United States v. Skrmetti, and what it says about how far the right has fallen into conspiratorialism

It’s her for me

When people complain about villains in fiction doing a whole monologue about their crimes and how unrealistic it is, just remember that this is how real villains behave.

If Dems can't make hay out of the optics here then retire, bitch

A lie THIS obvious isn’t an attempt to fool anyone; it’s just a pure expression of contempt.

Bit rich complaining about New York being taken over by immigrants when there's a big fucking statue in the harbour that invites everyone to come live there.

not the first person to make this observation but its incredible how drudge is the only news outlet in the country, including ostensibly liberal ones, that actually, for real, thinks trump is a bad president and wants him to fail

what exactly do the Dems who voted to table here think they're accomplishing millions upon millions of people took to the street just a couple weeks ago to protest this man, he's extremely unpopular by every measure we have, and he's asserting dictatorial power on a daily basis what are you doing

Every story quoting Trump would be improved dramatically if it included “given his track record he is probably lying.”

HUGE: Senate Parliamentarian says that Mike Lee's public land sell-off violates the Byrd rule, requires 60 votes in the Senate. A bunch of other terrible anti-environment provisions do too. This isn't over, but this is a huge win. www.budget.senate.gov/ranking-memb...

NANCY PELOSI: We must find the next generation of Democratic leadership. Young, charismatic and exciting candidates who can energize the party. People that voters love because they're not 80 years old and sold out to big capital. CHUCK SCHUMER (behind sniper rifle): Found one PELOSI: Take the shot

Powerful piece www.nytimes.com/2025/06/24/o...

🚨BREAKING: Trump just totally lost it over Israel/Iran. Wow.

This whole, "sexual assault and harassment is bad when Trump does it, but ok when our side does it," is sending a really clear message that the old guard of Democratic leadership only cares about women when it's politically advantageous. www.politico.com/news/2025/06...

leftists are consistently labeled as out of touch extremists, but there isn’t a single prominent left position this unpopular

The mayor of Huntington Park had formally directed the police department to enforce laws against ICE concerning unmarked vehicles, visible license plates and required agency identification.

It's why I dislike the people who say the evidence for these things was persuasive at the time. It really wasn't.

here’s what the onion’s full page spot is running next to this morning

By the way, one of the reasons it’s terrible all of these people lie all of the time about meaningless things is it makes it impossible to believe them when they’re talking about incredibly consequential things.

"We don’t topple systems—we disrupt them gently, with curated UX flows and tasteful earth tones."

can ppl stop screaming about WW3 the thing about world wars is to start one you need countries to go to war that have friends who also want to go to war for their buddy, not 2 countries led by guys whose own wives refuse to talk to them

It's a huge mistake to open up space for Trump like this, as if there's an "explanation" that makes this okay. There can be no suggestion of propriety, Dems need to be maximally confrontational. This isn't something the American people want. This is something that will fracture Trump's coalition.

really sums up the media’s coverage of the Trump presidency

“The truth is, these are not very bright guys, and things got out of hand.”

trump is going to split his base by going to war with iran and democrats will fail to capitalize on that because chuck schumer also wants to go to war with iran

If you were too young in 2003 here is what Bush told the American people: 1) The Iraq War won’t cost a lot of money 3) We won’t need a lot of troops 4) We’ll bring peace and freedom to Iraq 5) We’ll find WMDs 6) We’ll be welcomed as liberators 7) It will be easy 8) It won’t take long All lies.

The hardest rule of Beltway journalism is that Republican public officials have no agency and bear no responsibility for choices fully within their discretion

the political lesson everyone should take from Iraq is that you will regret being in favor of this sooner or later and the earlier you were against it the better off you’ll be ignore the media frenzy and stake your position now, it’s the right thing to do and it’s the ambitious thing to do too