dcintn.bsky.social
76 posts
9 followers
11 following
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
It's not what you think. Pay special notice to "political grievances". Within this context those apprehended can be charged with,or with supporting domestic terrorism.
comment in response to
post
No problem Champ
comment in response to
post
Absolutely love this.
comment in response to
post
Ok, to recap just so I'm clear.
US imposes tariffs Canada loses their shit, starts yanking Jack Daniels from the shelves, because they're big mad.
China executes Canadian citizens AND imposes tariffs and Canadians are quietly big mad at home, where nobody will see just how mad.
comment in response to
post
Where did I miss?
comment in response to
post
Me: I bet Canadians aren't going to be as upset about these executions as they are about US tariffs.
You: You'll lose that bet.
Me: Ok, show me Canadians pulling Chinese merchandise.
You: It just happened two days ago. Trust me bro, we're big mad
Me: I don't trust you bro
comment in response to
post
I'm going to bet you weren't even aware of the Chinese tariffs against Canadian goods or you wouldn't have mentioned comparing responses. If so...that's very telling... it's telling me I was spot on about only being upset when the media tells you to be upset.
comment in response to
post
I made no such claim.
Oh you mean there should be a different response to tariffs than there is to tariffs and executing your citizens?
I think you're right, it should be different... you're just on the wrong side of it...until the media tells you otherwise, Champ.
comment in response to
post
Two days is enough time for Google to capture some results if they were trending.
If it was a thing...no research skills would be necessary.
I value the opinion of folks on the ground. I asked for a link to Chinese merchandise being pulled.
Expect, I do not see "trust me bro" as a source
comment in response to
post
They should have stayed to boycott Musk. Sell outs. We're down here risking felony charges for torching Teslas and they just hop on the first ride home that comes along?
comment in response to
post
Guess we'll see. The media doesn't seem to be pushing for outrage and I haven't seen any. There's absolutely zero results returned about Canada boycotting China.
Put up or shut up Champ. Post a link to a video of Loblaws pulling Chinese merchandise from their shelves.
comment in response to
post
....that proves the point doesn't it?
comment in response to
post
👀🍿👀 I'm betting this isn't going to bother Canadians more than being taxed by the US the way they tax the US. My call is the media isn't going to tell them they should be angry...so they're not going to be angry.
comment in response to
post
Good. The Department of Education has raised the cost of education while lowering the quality of education. There's 40 years of data to support the claim. "Trump is bad" isn't a very strong case for keeping it.
comment in response to
post
Hamas would rather see all of their people killed than to release the hostages and give up their control. Hamas is not the hero. They terrorize their own people as well as Israel.
comment in response to
post
These vehicles had already been purchased, I would have to assume since this was a collision center. Nothing was done here other than destroying individuals property.
comment in response to
post
$3.98 per dozen seems reasonable to me. A couple of weeks ago my local grocery store had them on sale for $2.48 per dozen limit 2 per customer per transaction.
Kingsport TN.
comment in response to
post
Then they die. For the factory style hen houses, where the birds never go outside, it'd be worth letting it play out IMO. In free range flocks, the risk of spreading the flu would likely outweigh the benefit of the survivors. I think there would be tremendous value in breeding a more resilient bird
comment in response to
post
Herd, or flock, immunity is a thing. This is what happens in nature. It's been a thing for eons. The strong get sick, recover, and reproduce. The weak, get sick, then die and do not pass on their weak genetics. It's very basic biology.
comment in response to
post
The bottom line is the WFA, GARM, and the collective advertisers wanted to control what voices were heard by withholding ad income from voices that they didn't want heard. It may be protected 1A, it may be antitrust. It's not a cut and dry kinda thing.
comment in response to
post
The advertisers went along with it. That is how the lawsuit came about. A collective, that spends $900 billion per year, boycotting voices they don't agree with and promoting voices they do agree with is in a kinda gray area of antitrust. It'll be interesting how the courts see it.
comment in response to
post
Then the WFA launched GARM in 2019. (The WFA has since disbanded GARM) GARM went beyond the common sense ad placement and took up withholding ads from voices they didn't agree with politically. Garm was investigated by the House Judiciary for this. judiciary.house.gov/media/press-...
comment in response to
post
The suit against the advertising is in favor of free speech. I know that sounds odd. The WFA controls 90% of advertising and controls where ads are placed. This was done initially so you wouldn't see an ad for Clorox next to a news article depicting a murder scene or something of that sort.
comment in response to
post
My memory is a bit longer than a few years. It wasn't so long ago Musk was praised by the Left for bringing electric vehicles and solar panels to market. I welcome you to join the conversation if you can be honest and respectful.
comment in response to
post
Thank you for your time. I wish you and yours the best. At the end of the day we're all in it together.
comment in response to
post
I have a theory that you touched on. I think Musk has been offered up as the target for the ire of the left deserving of it or not. Then the left happily targeted their former champion without question.
comment in response to
post
Honest question. Prior to Musk becoming involved with reducing the size of government, did you ever once think "My government really should be larger. My government isn't spending/wasting enough money."
comment in response to
post
That's a whole other can of worms. I think passing a CR was a slap in the face to everyone who has been laid off from the government, the tax payers, everyone. Congress negated any savings DOGE had suggested. I still think DOGE must exist and succeed or we all fail.
comment in response to
post
Thank you for engaging with me. I don't want to push too hard...but... could you help me understand the benefit of driving down Tesla? I honestly don't understand how attacking a publicly traded company benefits anyone.
comment in response to
post
Honest question. Are you under the impression that Musk is closing agencies and terminating employees or that Musk's team is running numbers and based on the math x number of employees should be removed to increase efficiency then it's up to the agencies to do with the info what they will?
comment in response to
post
What is there to walk back? Seriously. I've come to this platform to try to understand the other side of it. My side of it is we must reduce the size and cost of government or we'll no longer be solvent as a nation, and it must be done quickly.
comment in response to
post
Where is the positive for the campaign against Musk? Who wins? The size of the government will be reduced with or without Musk.
comment in response to
post
Grow up. It was their decision to make.
comment in response to
post
Phase 1 of the cease fire has expired. For Phase 2 Israel wants the remaining living hostages held since 10/7/23 and the bodies of those killed while being held by Hamas released, or else. Hamas chose or else.
comment in response to
post
Yes, I agree at the suggestion of Musk federal employees have been negatively impacted. The negative impact of these employees will have a positive effect on our country's balance sheet. Where is the positive for the campaign against Musk? Who wins? The size of gov will be reduced w/wo Musk.
comment in response to
post
Cool 😎 We're full send on discrimination as long as our target is wealthy? Who are we going after first? Oprah, Tiger Woods, Tyler Perry, who are we going to ridicule first? I'm with ya, we just need to be on the same page. This is gonna be wild, they'll not even see it coming.
comment in response to
post
Ah, I see, blindly follow and ask no questions. If you do, you will be ridiculed. Sounds a whole lot like a cult to me. Scratch that, it sounds exactly like a cult. Enjoy your Flavor Aid.
comment in response to
post
But fuck you all the same.
comment in response to
post
It's an honest question. I don't recall the main branches ever accepting intersex folks. The best I could come up with using Google was the Civil Air Patrol and the Coast Guard Auxiliary accepted intersex folks. Perhaps it is the article that was in bad faith and not someone asking a question.
comment in response to
post
When were intersex folks accepted into the military? The first two paragraphs didn't give a count of intersex vets. No need to continue, that'd be important supporting information. Does anyone know how many intersex vets we have if any?
comment in response to
post
You seriously don't see the similarities between some and the Nazis? Harassment, damaging property, intimidation, scare tactics towards customers of a business they are boycotting?
comment in response to
post
How did that lose you? The Nazis did call for boycotts of businesses that didn't align with them politically. I can see the similarities here. For example damaging the property of someone for doing business with a company the leaders do not approve of. You opened the door, I just walked on in.
comment in response to
post
To be clear : My training is to understand that you calling for a boycott of a business because you don't agree with the politics of one of its owners is similar to the Nazis calling for the boycott of businesses that didn't agree with them. Got it.
comment in response to
post
The auto pen, really isn't the issue, but seems to be the focus. The issue is Trump alleges that Biden was not aware of who was using the auto pen and not aware of what documents the auto pen was being used to sign. Why is the focus on the pen? Is it because the unawareness is plausible?
comment in response to
post
You win. That was my "That's enough internet for the day." moment today. 🤣 I'll never not see it now 🤣
comment in response to
post
Go for it. Where did I miss? I'm completely open to being wrong. My stance is : There are some trying to get at Musk regardless of the negative impact of others.
comment in response to
post
Lord... how did we get here? You freely cheering on the job loss and negative financial impact of your fellow citizens turned into a Nazi concentration camp? I do see the similarities between the Nazi boycott of businesses that didn't think the way they did and this though.
comment in response to
post
We're saying the same thing. This is about "pulling support" (damaging) from a domestic company, regardless of the negative impact on your fellow countrymen. As long as you get a jab in at Musk, it's worth negatively impacting hundreds of thousands of fellow countrymen.
comment in response to
post
This seems like a more accurate meme for the current situation with Tesla.