demodisping.bsky.social
572 posts
71 followers
71 following
Getting Started
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
And you thought Chris Christie had low numbers.
comment in response to
post
What are they referring to? 1300+ protests last week happened.
comment in response to
post
That's what I thought. It's classified? Shared it w/the judge in private.
comment in response to
post
It says nothing good about this Administration that someone they admit to having wrongfully disappeared cannot be returned.
comment in response to
post
Don't see how any of that obviates the SCOTUS ruling.
comment in response to
post
It's a trap!
comment in response to
post
They probably gave a bonus to the person who thought of this evil.
comment in response to
post
And when Trump's DOJ refuses to make those people available? Sternly worded letters won't be enough.
comment in response to
post
How do all of these supposedly smart people not know that there is no appeasing the bully. Now that they've given him their lunch money, he'll be coming for their lunch itself, and more, soon enough.
comment in response to
post
How do these supposedly smart people not know that there is no appeasing the bully. Now that they've given him their lunch money, he'll be coming for their lunch itself soon enough.
comment in response to
post
I had to seek out the music!
comment in response to
post
His one consistency in life is lying.
comment in response to
post
Antisemitism is awful, and no one should engage in it.
At the same time, here in America, freedom of speech, as guaranteed by the First Amendment, generally applies to non-citizens in the United States. It's not a crime, even if it is shitty behavior.
comment in response to
post
70 million people voted for, and own, this. That's who. Ask them why they voted that way.
comment in response to
post
Ask for a show of hands on the work floor for those who voted for Trump.
comment in response to
post
Maybe they shouldn't have voted for Trump.
comment in response to
post
There are several off-ramps and paths of delay available to the Adminsitration; while he languishes in jail.
comment in response to
post
The question is does the Trump Administration know that, and even if so informed, will they care.
comment in response to
post
The next few years will be cases around the meaning of "facilitate".
comment in response to
post
But the District Court's use of "effecuate" was vague, but SCOTUS' use of "facilitate" is not.
comment in response to
post
You mean all hope is not lost?
comment in response to
post
So now they can look forward to the nonsensical job interview question "Why is there a gap in your resume?".
comment in response to
post
Bill got his money back + more.
comment in response to
post
Trump's Court coming through for him again.
comment in response to
post
Stop calling it trade and call it an exchange.
comment in response to
post
For anyone with any degree of retirement savings in the market, the fluctuations of the market effect their ability to *PARTICIPATE* in the economy, where "participate" means having enough money to live on, @nytimes.com
comment in response to
post
Daddy Roberts to the rescue for Little Donnie
comment in response to
post
Back when they thought Trump wouldn't follow through on what he'd said he'd do, but rather would do what they'd convinced themselves he would do.
comment in response to
post
... "and it will be automated"
I'm no Lutnick fan, but you're much, much better than leaving out that part @atrupar.com
comment in response to
post
Feels more like click bait, ie "You won't believe which Art Deco theatre is reopening!"
comment in response to
post
Trump thinks the economy he grew up in is the economy of today.
comment in response to
post
People are trying to escape the garbage they're getting from Trump's 2nd term.
comment in response to
post
"A landmark Art Deco movie theater"? Is there any intentional reason you don't include the name of the theater?
comment in response to
post
Maybe Ron Vara and John Baron can co-write a fake book together.
comment in response to
post
What is the plan of action when they either ignore it or defy it?
comment in response to
post
Too late; they gave him their balls and he's not giving them back.
comment in response to
post
Sure, let the guy who has tanked the economy here and in other countries, who thinks trade deficits are the other country "ripping us off", with several bankruptcies, 34 felony convictions an adjudication of sexual assault to his name and obviously declining mental capacity control it all.
comment in response to
post
Too bad for them; you gotta dance with the one who brung ya.
comment in response to
post
But Kamala's laugh, right?
comment in response to
post
Hey @wsj.com - shrinking HHS makes sense?
What makes you think you know?
Prove it?
comment in response to
post
12th Amendment states:
“No person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice President.”
This suggests that if someone is barred from being elected President (due to the 22nd Amendment), they are also ineligible to be Vice President.
comment in response to
post
comment in response to
post
à la carte is just a dream some of us had ...
comment in response to
post
She would be valuable and useful in a multitude of ways outside of the Oval if that's what she wants.