dsteuer.bsky.social
Was Silicon Valley lawyer. Current aspiration is to be a curmudgeon with a heart.
219 posts
1,126 followers
197 following
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
The True Believers only care about failures of integrity when they can find a Democrat to accuse.
comment in response to
post
Source: open.substack.com/pub/fpwellma...
comment in response to
post
Two steps down from gibberish.
comment in response to
post
š
comment in response to
post
But the new chief does have crypto experience. . .
comment in response to
post
Donāt worry. He pardoned Ross Ulbrecht to keep the pipeline robust.
comment in response to
post
Not Gene Landy?
comment in response to
post
Mills is 77 years old. Try another threat, orange shitgibbon.
comment in response to
post
High as a kite
comment in response to
post
Pussy Galore must help us here!
comment in response to
post
In Econ 1 back in the day, I was taught (by Michael Boskin!) that inflation was caused by more dollars bidding for goods. Was not taught that the provenance of the hand holding the dollars was determinative. I guess they have advanced in economic research.
comment in response to
post
I think Trump was more triggered by Zelenskyyās failure to fabricate evidence against Biden in 2020.
comment in response to
post
A few months ago, this would lead to a resignation.
Today, likely promotion.
comment in response to
post
Excellent piece.
comment in response to
post
Actually, Hitler did strenuously blame the Poles. He had German soldiers dress up as Polish infantry and fire into Germany. The next day, Sept. 1 1939, Hitler announced to the Reichstag āSeit 5:45 Uhr, wird jetzt zurĆ¼ckgeschossen.ā (Since 5:45 we have returned fire.). And WWII began.
comment in response to
post
I read it a little differently. It reflects Democratic frustration over the passivity of Congressional Democrats. Republican Congressmen are supported by Republicans, but are still unpopular overall.
comment in response to
post
Chance to hear Dershowitz should spike applications.
comment in response to
post
Rhetorical question?
comment in response to
post
Who will rake the forests?
comment in response to
post
And Ukraine
comment in response to
post
Leonās appealing the Delaware courtās rejection of his $52 billion looting of Tesla just for the principle of the thing.
comment in response to
post
What a fool believes . . .
comment in response to
post
No way this happens without a substantial payout by us to these countries.
comment in response to
post
Congressional Demos donāt want to upset THE DONORRRRRRSS!
comment in response to
post
Totally adorbs
comment in response to
post
So mendacious
comment in response to
post
Tough to see what possible advantage is gained by actively encouraging the worldās democracies to hate us.
comment in response to
post
Grey Poupon!!
comment in response to
post
Statute of limitation is five years, subject to extension. Still a risk, assuming we have actual elections in four years.
comment in response to
post
Democrats controlled Congress. Big difference.
comment in response to
post
Finally! An administration that listens to public demands to destroy public health and gut cancer research.
comment in response to
post
Treason is very au courant these days.
comment in response to
post
Fighting cancer is woke.
comment in response to
post
Not most. A plurality. It matters.
comment in response to
post
Every word is a lie. BTW, does he have any concept of what is required of the U.S. right now under Articlex 5 and 6 of the NATO treaty in the weird event that Canada is attacked (and by whom? Greenland? Litonia?).
comment in response to
post
Why not rename a bordering ocean The American Ocean?
comment in response to
post
But Art, how did they discover your secret?
comment in response to
post
Heās right about letting the Republican Party go to hell ā by not convicting Trump.
comment in response to
post
He couldnāt get off the couch.
comment in response to
post
Upside: PI normally stays in place until trial concludes. But downside ā and it is large ā the plaintiff will not have the benefit of discovery when the PI is immediately appealed, and thus will have to defend a record that would likely be stronger with discovery.
comment in response to
post
Narrator: Adams will take this lying down.
comment in response to
post
What happens if . . . Palestinians donāt want to be moved? Hmmm?
comment in response to
post
A masterpiece. Where is the movie adaptation?
comment in response to
post
Should work about as well as his treaty signing with Kim Jong Un.
comment in response to
post
Solvang is already the California/Danish capital in waiting.
comment in response to
post
Iām surprised he didnāt defer to bearded man in the skychair.
comment in response to
post
Traitor
comment in response to
post
A delayed 48 year veto of the FCPA?