electro5001.bsky.social
Guy with a boyfriend. Potentially someone super important later.
125 posts
67 followers
41 following
Getting Started
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
How does a social media platform go to shit THIS quickly
comment in response to
post
Enemies for life
comment in response to
post
Yeah honestly this time around I think it’ll probably pass the senate 51-49 but face a really hard time in the House. I doubt all 220 republicans vote for it, especially the republicans in swing districts will reject it.
comment in response to
post
They were able to get it through the house though no? I thought the senate held them up. Were there issues in the house too?
comment in response to
post
This also probably means they won’t be able to pass ACA repeal through the house
comment in response to
post
I would wear losing my life savings to Hawk Tuah with a badge of honor
comment in response to
post
I struggle to think what your outlook on the world would have to be to come up with this take. even the hardcore jucheists wouldn’t make this take because it would imply that North and South Korea could exist peacefully together. What are you.
comment in response to
post
Duarte on his mcdonalds arc rn
comment in response to
post
THE SKY IS BLUE.
comment in response to
post
How do you check how many ppl blocked you lmao
comment in response to
post
China is a leader for sure but the growth is everywhere
comment in response to
post
Awesome but the US is still growing exponentially so it’s not just china and its global
comment in response to
post
comment in response to
post
If I meant China I’d’ve said China
comment in response to
post
China produces 33% and we’re producing 16%. We’re keeping up.
comment in response to
post
Uh yeah. It’s an interest group representing billionaire ceos. They would invest money into the billionaire guy.
comment in response to
post
Yeah can’t say the same I think I made a bad take somewhere here. Other than that I still think I’m right. Maybe the books will change my mind. Don’t know.
comment in response to
post
Awesome, will read
comment in response to
post
Awesome good talk
comment in response to
post
Got any recommendations or are you gonna be vague because you haven’t read anything
comment in response to
post
Yeah I don’t even know where that came from because 2024 is gonna be another record breaking year. www.utilitydive.com/news/utility....
comment in response to
post
Globally and nationally solar installations hit records under Biden. I will give him credit for that.
comment in response to
post
Increasing the amount of people working in producing clean energy is indisputably good unless you’re an oil tycoon.
comment in response to
post
There’s no shit. Clean energy has been on the up-and-up globally for the past 4 years thanks in no small part to Biden. I will continue to give him credit for that.
comment in response to
post
Call me when you can travel into the future and get data from there and we’ll talk.
Like this isn’t new policy he’s been doing this for years. I think if what you were saying was true we’d be seeing it by now.
comment in response to
post
Except solar installation broke records in 2023 and you’re literally wrong
comment in response to
post
Prices aren’t going up. The government is subsidizing the industry. Biden isn’t blindly slapping tariffs on things without a thought. He’s not Trump.
comment in response to
post
And yet…
comment in response to
post
It didn’t! That’s what makes what he did all the more impressive.
comment in response to
post
This is about biden who has been in charge for four years and has done more for clean energy production nationally and globally than any other president in the past 30 years. Yes I will give him credit for that and I will die on this hill
comment in response to
post
I could ask the same to you? How is more clean energy jobs bad for the climate? More jobs means more panels, windmills, private investment, etc.
comment in response to
post
There’s no reason to believe that the domestic production is harming the transition to clean energy
comment in response to
post
They haven’t though!
comment in response to
post
Like again you’re working under the assumption that an american solar industry should undercut China when that has never been the case.
comment in response to
post
He’s not curbing china’s. Global usage of solar has been climbing at the same exponential rate it has been for a long time.
comment in response to
post
I am thinking it through. His call to action was more investment. He doesn’t think that the chinese investing in the climate is a bad thing.
comment in response to
post
You said that more clean energy jobs weren’t good if it was at the expense of the climate. I fail to see how more clean energy jobs could possibly come at the expense of the climate.
comment in response to
post
Biden does not care if China has a solar industry. He just wants the US to have one too. He’s worried that the Chinese one would undercut the American one, and he doesn’t want to keep our industry by undercutting theirs either. He just wants America to have domestic production.
comment in response to
post
I’d rather blame George W Bush than Biden
comment in response to
post
More clean energy jobs is a universal good for the climate. You’re working off the assumption that Biden was bad for the environment. Dishonest.
comment in response to
post
Fine then. Yes the oil thing is bad. I’m willing to forgive him though because if he didn’t lower oil prices somewhat he would’ve been drowned in the midterm elections and that would’ve been worse for the environment than just drilling more now