fascismsucksboi.bsky.social
40 posts
9 followers
24 following
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
Shut the fuck up dipshit
comment in response to
post
Yep and it's not even a contest
comment in response to
post
"Assume deer dead"
comment in response to
post
Yeah my friend told me about the lengths they went to keep theirs on the d/l for that very reason. Easy way to get infiltrated from the feds otherwise...or many other things
comment in response to
post
runs a soup kitchen to help people who are food insecure eat, one isn't better than the other, you just both picked different lanes.
comment in response to
post
For all of the "yeah but what about THIS exception" responses, the point isn't to say that there aren't bad ways for fight fascism, but to stop degrading perfectly valid methods of fighting simply because it's not your preferred way. If you're a street protest organizer and your neighbor
comment in response to
post
Post about it because I don't want getting praised for it to be the point, I just wanna do the work.
comment in response to
post
Like I've phonebanked, run booths for national organizations, harassed Senators by phone/mail/fax, and have a trip to the state Capitol planned to help canvas, but because I don't post pics of myself at protests all over social media, I get asked "what are you even doing?" .
The point is not to
comment in response to
post
This is why I left social media other than this because beimg performative is encouraged and it actually pulled my focus. I did more community work in the 3 months post leaving FB than the previous ten years combined because I spent less time worrying about appearances and just started doing.
comment in response to
post
You're saying the opposite of what Scalzi is saying. Protests are merely one way of fighting. Some fundraiser, do volunteer work, phone bank, protect the vulnerable. But the "protest is the only action" crowd suggests that is 'doing nothing'. It's not.
comment in response to
post
Are you already doing it or are you demand other people do it?
comment in response to
post
comment in response to
post
Coward blocked
comment in response to
post
Words, pointing out "you clearly issued this EO to specifically target transgender people with animus and are now pretending to invoke a medical reason for it post facto"
comment in response to
post
Other discharges for medical conditions. The judge is saying "the military already has a policy in place for discharges for mental or behavioral disorders - if that's all you are claiming to do here, why wouldn't that existing policy apply, as opposed to you creating a brand new one?". In other
comment in response to
post
So this isn't what the judge is saying, but rather using the military's own words against them to indicate this policy still appears discriminatory. The DOJ claims that this is not a ban on transgender soldiers, but those who suffer from gender dysphoria, a medical condition, and comparing it to
comment in response to
post
Speaking as someone in said room, how about you don't speak for me
comment in response to
post
Uhh...why?
comment in response to
post
You were rude and dismissive to her
comment in response to
post
Why are you being an aggressive, condescending asshole?
comment in response to
post
The fuck are you talking about? Are you a bot?
The deadline is 5/27. The author has one already
comment in response to
post
Wrong, that happens May 27th, and also OP had Real ID
comment in response to
post
This is the dumbest shit I ever read
comment in response to
post
Nice sentiment but some of us are required to travel for work
comment in response to
post
I've been a far leftist longer than you've ever been alive, you fucking useless cumbubble
comment in response to
post
Civil contempt is NOT the same as a civil lawsuit. God you're a lobotomized orangutan
comment in response to
post
You fucking moron, that isn't how it works at all.
Fucking poser assed cunt.
comment in response to
post
Are you having a stroke?
comment in response to
post
So will you be off for real this time?
I'm just curious as this was like your sixth farewell message
comment in response to
post
ground, she is calling you out right now. There's pretty good reason for it.
comment in response to
post
You said Chris's article claims everything is normal, which it very much does not. You are using Lo-rah of being a Chuck Schumer-like Liberal when, if you had read her other skeets, you'd have seen she shares plenty of common ground with you.
You should maybe question why, despite that common
comment in response to
post
Do you enjoy arguing with strawmen?
Because all you've done is argue with things you conjured up out of whole cloth.
comment in response to
post
And suggesting Chris said everything is business as normal is a goddamn lie. I can tell you don't read his page at fucking all.
The end result is that eventually, these people who do this tireless work will get tired of the performative nihilists and stop posting out of frustration.
comment in response to
post
Counterpoint- you are an idiot that knows nothing about nothing
comment in response to
post
And here comes the misogyny, right on cue
comment in response to
post
You're a slam poet, not a lawyer
comment in response to
post
Actually, no, that only applies to criminal contempt charges. Civil contempt charges can be served by anybody the court deputizes. Maybe you should stop condescending to people who know more than you
comment in response to
post
I'm tired of people weaponizing the word "gaslit" to refer to simply disagreeing with somebody. Gaslighting is a serious form of emotional abuse and invoking it merely to win or quiet an opponent on social media not only robs the word of its utility but also demeanor victims of actual gaslighting
comment in response to
post
You're a bad person
comment in response to
post
You didn't write clearly.