fosojedi.bsky.social
Commissioned Officer with the NOAA Commissioned Corps
Currently the Commanding Officer of a Hydrographic Survey Vessel and future Senior Advisor to the CFO.
Master of Business Administration from UMUC
Master of Environmental Science from Taylor University
457 posts
194 followers
54 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
@muellershewrote.bsky.social can you make a separate post just letting everyone know that hr@opm isn't the address we're supposed to reply to. I'm 99% certain that's an unmonitored inbox and everyone sending email isn't going to likely do anything.
comment in response to
post
It's not. The reply to is different.
comment in response to
post
That's an unmonitored email. The reply to was a different address for each agency
comment in response to
post
That's not actually the email though. That's an unread email box. The reply to is hr0@ or hr1@
comment in response to
post
You gotta do it like the Unleashing Alaska EO
comment in response to
post
That's what I was wondering...
comment in response to
post
That's not the reply to email
comment in response to
post
It's [email protected]
comment in response to
post
Goes back to the original question: who is running DOGE?
comment in response to
post
I wouldn't respond if I was on leave. I would respond the next business day I was working unless told to take OT by my supervisor. I told my employees if they were working OT tomorrow they could do this on it.
comment in response to
post
I'd rather drive a Reliant Robin
comment in response to
post
The thing is that it's really going to be fed through AI so no one is really going to read it.
But I figure it says approximately 5 and to me 25 bullets is approximately 5 and if I have to spend an hour doing that that's what I'm doing Monday.
comment in response to
post
Plus, since they didn't say that in the email, there is no way for people not on social media to not know that. Thousands are on leave and won't see that email and therefore can't respond.
comment in response to
post
And people keep denying what that really is.
comment in response to
post
The truth is they don't care about saving money. Grover Norquist announced their plans years ago: make gov't so small they can drown it in the sink.
That's their plan. And, frankly, Trump isn't running the show. Russ Vought is.
comment in response to
post
Sounds like you got a pretty good deal
comment in response to
post
which is the DEI hire...
comment in response to
post
That's why every new cartographer should read "How to Lie with Maps"
comment in response to
post
comment in response to
post
I'm subject to a drug test policy...doubt he is...
comment in response to
post
hands are too big
comment in response to
post
Legally, it has to be a "standing, interim or special committee of the Mississippi Legislature". So, I guess the question is, does this group meet that definition? The MS legislature by itself doesn't meet the definition.
comment in response to
post
Man...I want to root for them because...obvious reasons...but it seems like they only got mad that people were booing during the national anthem and so they immediately started fighting Canadians.
I'm not rooting for people that immediately want to start fighting Canadians as their first response.
comment in response to
post
I don't think that's fair. There were a lot of us and a lot on here including @meidastouch.com sounding the alarm then.
comment in response to
post
Remember when Jefferies compared your party to Aaron Judge?
Right now, you're simply watching strikes sail by...
comment in response to
post
It's way less too...because many of the "contracts" are BPAs and IDIQs or other contract vehicles where the government was never going to spend that full amount and can STILL spend the money it was going to spend...they just have to go about it a more difficult way.
comment in response to
post
And apparently we cancelled a $1B contract with Leidos for the Social Security Administration!?!?
comment in response to
post
And, realistically, is this really a contact the Department of State wanted to cancel??
Or are we turning those services over to Musk?
comment in response to
post
They also list contracts like this where there are $0 in savings.
But because it's a Department of Education contract, they definitely want to show it's cancelled.
comment in response to
post
CFPB had similar training vendors but they were limited to $9,999,999.
comment in response to
post
Or there are the several DEI training vendors that were cleared for up to $25M and were contact vehicles similar to the BPAs. Again, it doesn't mean those companies were going to get $25M. It means that the government could utilize any of those companies freely and pay each time up to that amount.
comment in response to
post
So, what are some of the other "savings"? Several Blanket Purchase Agreements with $20M. What are those? They allow an agency to buy goods from a company repeatedly. But it doesn't mean they're going to spend $20M from that company. It just means they can keep buying from them.
comment in response to
post
So, you changed the goal posts. You went from major commercial plane crashes to just crashes. There have been commercial plane crashes and some with fatalities in the last 16 years.
comment in response to
post
You didn't tag Mayor/Secretary @petebuttigieg.bsky.social
How's he supposed to let you know?
comment in response to
post
comment in response to
post
I hear many of them are still collecting social security though...
comment in response to
post
Do Democrats have a spine?
They need to find a different minority leader.
comment in response to
post
Should have been. But they continued to make it clear that they didn't care at all how immoral he was they were willing to join him.