givemeadouble.bsky.social
Make Tacos, Not War. Golf Addict. Drug Pusher
1,756 posts
121 followers
154 following
Getting Started
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
That only goes so far till they have to pay you. I’m not going to let that get in the way of them hearing my thoughts.
comment in response to
post
Lol that’s retaliation. I, too have family that are government employees.
comment in response to
post
If you’re a government employee, sure. If not, I don’t think it matters.
comment in response to
post
I think we should test that premise.
comment in response to
post
Negative. Feel free to signal boost it. I’d like nothing more than that account to get 50 million emails this weekend.
comment in response to
post
Why ask your friends, I’m glad to share it: [email protected]
comment in response to
post
People are still refusing to engage with what a withdrawal on that timeline means and simply want to wave their hands and say it should have gone better. It’s similar to Republican complaints of Obama following the execution of the SOFA in Iraq.
comment in response to
post
Right but when we elected Biden, we didn’t elect a King. We elected a President that 46% of the electorate voted against.
comment in response to
post
What happens when the layoffs hit the ~90% of federal workers that aren’t in the DMV?
comment in response to
post
What is interesting is in Vietnam and post 9/11, we could visually distinguish the enemy. How do we do that with Canadians? How would yo secure the largest unprotected border on the planet? Every one always thinks it’s over when the formal fighting ends. No, it’s not over then, it’s just beginning.
comment in response to
post
You should ask the Taliban what insurgents can do in rubble.
comment in response to
post
I have seen two insurgencies up close and personal. Americans conveniently ignored the wars in the Middle East. They won’t be able to ignore a bloodbath on their doorstep.
comment in response to
post
When are you heading to the recruiting center to enlist?
comment in response to
post
Lol liberal “Yankees” are hoping you bleed the US dry in an insurgency should this actually come to pass. So maybe you’re a bit wrong.
comment in response to
post
On your way pumpkin, you’re dismissed.
comment in response to
post
I’d like you to understand the words you’re using so you don’t look like a fucking moron. Trying to be edgy by suggesting you’d kill your fellow countrymen isn’t the good point that you think it is.
comment in response to
post
No, it wasn’t the violence. It was the threat of terrorism. And if you can’t tell the difference between the two, that’s a you problem, chief. Whether or not you could help is a matter of you understanding English, which to be fair is an open question.
comment in response to
post
LMAOOOOO
“Unless we show them” is rather definitive, champ. Again showing off that sharp grasp on the English language
comment in response to
post
No, it’s up to you because you seem to not know the meaning of the words YOU are using.
comment in response to
post
Yes, and it was completely subsumed by “unless we show them.”
comment in response to
post
“Unless we show them”
Words have meaning.
comment in response to
post
Almost 90% of federal workers aren’t even from the big bad DMV. The GOP loves to throw out there that federal workers are these coastal elites that all live in the swamp. And that simply isn’t true. It would be great if Dems made that point clearly.
comment in response to
post
Blocking judicial nominees and cabinet nominees to the point that Dems introduced new rules doesn’t count?
comment in response to
post
It was specifically addressing this post. Because it was wrong. And the GOP did was it could the moment it could. bsky.app/profile/bene...
comment in response to
post
Yes, because Republicans can do everything they want by reconciliation.
comment in response to
post
Yeah, we are held hostage to idiots not voting or voting against their interests. Take it up with them.
comment in response to
post
Lol you dumb fucking schmuck. It’s true, talking to you does make people stupider.
comment in response to
post
But thanks for confirming that you’re a fucking idiot. bsky.app/profile/kern...
comment in response to
post
I was raised in a country that knows Hinderburg was an arch conservative Prussian officer, you fucking clown.
comment in response to
post
I know what the origin was and I know what people have been arguing all day. Why don’t you leave American politics to Americans.
comment in response to
post
Lol I see now you are having troubling following a simple thread. Cool
comment in response to
post
My dude, read the thread again and see that I agree.
comment in response to
post
Executive orders that might not stand up to judicial scrutiny.
comment in response to
post
I’m brown, you dumb bitch
comment in response to
post
Man it’s almost like Dems in 2009 were a very broad coalition to the point that a lot of them couldn’t win Democratic primaries even in the reddest states today.
comment in response to
post
But seriously…
comment in response to
post
Some progress is not as good as no progress?
comment in response to
post
Except the amount of times they get BAD or WRONG information is astounding. LLMs often just make things up.
comment in response to
post
Again, the question was when did the GOP successfully start blocking stuff. And it was as soon as the GOP could.
comment in response to
post
You just put down cross party coalitions like that’s on Democrats to achieve and put down state level resistance like there aren’t dozens of lawsuits by Democratic attorneys general all over the country. Perhaps you needed a lot less rapid replying.
comment in response to
post
They started schedule blocked things as soon as Scott Brown was elected. The GOP set a filibuster record that year in the Senate!