gregwa.bsky.social
Escaping from the other place. Recovering academic (film theory/philosophy) but returning to my first love (biological sciences) and wondering what it's all about. None the wiser, but better informed.
787 posts
295 followers
1,218 following
Discussion Master
comment in response to
post
The growing sophistication of LLMS is going to put some severe twists in that corkscrew. I think a more radical approach is going to be needed that asks what are we assessing undergrads for in the first place. Attendance, engagement and their own sense of intellectual engagement matter more.
comment in response to
post
Yes, that sounds a good idea, but you can't use that as the sole mode of assessment and how long will even they remain immune? I don't just blame AI (or students) for this mess, but a culture of quantification that has degraded intellectual development in favour of grades.
comment in response to
post
No system of assessment is ideal (and we do far too much of it) but AI has pretty much killed coursework. You can of course combine both by giving them seen as well as unseen exams so they can prepare ahead of time for them, but you still guarantee that they are their words.
comment in response to
post
Because they are harder for lazy students to get grades that flatter their lack of effort
comment in response to
post
The proper solution is to assess (massively) less, but I can't seethe being allowed.
comment in response to
post
and marking isn't?
comment in response to
post
Agreed, but I bet there is going to be a back lash from University Administration, probably using Extenuating Circumstances policy as a way to try to counter it. They have been doing everything they can to encourage grade inflation
comment in response to
post
They are indeed idiots, but tragedy is these people are increasingly in positions of real power and influence and the damage their idiocy will cause is not going to be limited to their own intellectually wizened and morally vacuous lives.
comment in response to
post
Undoubtedly this will become yet another example of that long line of attempts at regime change that have gone really smoothly and not collapsed into a miasma of unintended consequences that resonate for decades.
comment in response to
post
and if they achieve that what of the unintended consequences?
comment in response to
post
Crossing Chad in 40C heat we noticed that the feral goats could distinguish exactly which of (to our eyes identical) scrubby trees had the most shade. After being evicted they would stare back at us from a near but clearly inferior canopy with a look that can only be described as passive aggressive.
comment in response to
post
6. Do it less.
comment in response to
post
Gardening (as opposed to plant shopping). Propagating from seed, division and cuttings is remarkable cheap and a half decent spade and fork will last for decades. Not to mention a huge amount of time is spent weeding and those bastards arrive for free.
comment in response to
post
A victory from which they will never recover
comment in response to
post
The patterns have always been there but I think there are lulls and troughs in intensity. Interesting piece by David Runicman in the LRB which does suggest both Alt right and left have dug in to more absolutist positions and binary rhetoric as the channels to spread their options have proliferated.
comment in response to
post
While our capacity for tribalism/polarisation seems fairly innate what seems different is a wider demand for ideological purity that denies any area of respectful disagreement. The socially liberal shout at people they disagree with online the same intolerance and vehemence as the reactionaries.
comment in response to
post
Parties can only exist in a ecosystem where they represent (or are perceived to) a particular set of interests. Who exactly do the Tories serve who isn't equally at home elsewhere? I'm not sure there is a niche for liberal conservatism anymore not least as they salted that earth with Brexit.
comment in response to
post
The good stuff (as with photography) undoubtedly will. But I suspect that will sit atop a pile of mundane, derivative dross. I'm not a fan and think the energy consumption is criminal, but I don't think it will do away with human creativity anymore than other tech (writing, oil paint etc) has.
comment in response to
post
I can see people doing/swapping fan fic Friends (video as well as the script) and a talent for prompting become valued like one to turn a phrase. It could also become part of gaming. Like photography's effect on the visual arts it could be more democratic, but maybe more banal and pornographic.
comment in response to
post
I suspect beyond taking over types of existing content (corporate work, reports, brochures, manluals etc) its effect on inventing new forms of entertainment with words will be equally significant. Replacement won't simply be like for like, AI doing what you do, but it taking attention elsewhere.
comment in response to
post
I'm not sure someone so reptilian can do worried. Hedging his bets more probably, not least as I think Musk is already trying to row back.
comment in response to
post
I think E has become less likely after the Epstien jibe, but if they don't find a way to deescalate this will in effect be a showdown between the power of the state over the power of capital, both in their most raw and base form. Beyond the entertainment this is oligarchy v totalitarianism.
comment in response to
post
you don't buy a ticket to win, but to fantasise. Compared with other media that engage the imagination and make you examine what you think you desire the ticket isn't bad value for money.
comment in response to
post
There are certain types of US Mega Corps (Haliburton and most Big Tech) that see chaos and crises as fantastic opportunities to makes obscene profits (not least from the govt/taxpayer) with little to no interest, or understanding in what they destroy in the process. They see 'Science' as a target
comment in response to
post
Unfortunately next to the majesty of creation what the Universe does best is pitiless indifference.
comment in response to
post
best line ever about superheroes (Scott Bukatman I think) was they don't dress up in order to fight crime, but fight crime in order to dress up.
comment in response to
post
While taxes need to rise for everyone, to regain some sense that they are justified we need to at least try to reduce the obscene wealth gap. That was my point. If one decides that is (politically administratively) impossible, people are not going to just shrug, there will be serious consequences
comment in response to
post
So what was the NHS, comprehensive education, nationalised services etc all bought on tick?
comment in response to
post
I'm am and I'm sure they were all very sensible. Unfortunately sensible isn't going to cut it for much longer as the social contract built over the last century is collapsing and new tech and climate crisis will exacerbate rather than ameliorate the situation.
comment in response to
post
and as Thomas Pikkerty argued its a pretty unreliable stat. For example it doesn't take account of what costs you can't avoid spending out of your 'disposable' income. If half your wages go on rent you aren't as rich as the GINI coefficient trumpets. It also misses wealth accumulation effects.
comment in response to
post
All economic indicators demonstrate wealth inequality is increasing. No "seem" about it. As long as reasonable centrist continue to claim they have as much control over this as the weather the pressure for more radical and violent responses (probably from the right rather than left) will increase
comment in response to
post
What people are picking up on is an acceptance of unfairness not simply a rejected 'magic' solution.The ultra rich have got massively richer over the last few decades, the mega corps they own seem to pay little tax and the future seems to look even more unjust. Shouldn't we be despairing at that?
comment in response to
post
he is now just holding a dead puppy so short of a radical change of leadership (which isn't going to happen) I think there is little option but to attempt a realignment on the centre/left.
comment in response to
post
It's true that taxing the rich can't fund everything but 1. It would be nice if they actually paid in % terms closer to what they used to because 2. the tax system would feel more equitable so the majority would then be more likely to accept tax rises on them. I know, it isn't going to happen.
comment in response to
post
It's when stupidity isn't simply a misunderstanding but a wilful ignorance working in the service of hate and greed that the real damage is done.
comment in response to
post
Do Morgdroids dream of elected sheep
comment in response to
post
We have leftist nuggets. Its called chicken katsu
comment in response to
post
As a good friend said to me back in the late 90s postmodernism is very clever, but I'm not sure it is particulalry wise.
comment in response to
post
Our politics still can't escape the toxic legacy of Brexit. The Tories became addicted to their own worst instincts which begat Reform and then Labour normalised them by seeing it as a legitimate policy to ape rather than something catastrophic and pathological. Both will be destroyed by it.
comment in response to
post
Unfortunately I'm not sure Labour under its current leadership is cosplaying. They are cultural/social reactionaries who are mildly economic centrists at best.
comment in response to
post
I fear they are so far down the hard/blue Labour track there isn't any coming back, certainly not under the current leadership.
comment in response to
post
Absolutely. It will make space for the old takeaway plastic and aluminium containers.
comment in response to
post
A lack of political imagination, a hope things will return to some sort of more usual balance, a fear of the unknown, ingrained habit or some sort of combination of all of them I suspect.
comment in response to
post
Come on! Besides getting it wrong on Trump, Big Tech, the EU, disability benefits, back door privatisation of the NHS, environmental protection, stupid red lines on borrowing and parroting Reform on immigration, Starmer is getting all the big calls right.
comment in response to
post
It is fascinating stuff. Best origins of life book I've read is Nick Lane's THE VITAL QUESTION. Highly recommend it.
comment in response to
post
as a Palace support I had a lovely day. Just lovely.
comment in response to
post
that's a pity. However, if you work out the twist in season 2 that soon I'll accuse you of stealing the script.
comment in response to
post
Bad Sisters was fun but not in a stupid way. More black comedy than thriller but I'd recommend it.
comment in response to
post
It is always good (in the Aristotelian sense) to be a Palace fan. It is not always enjoyable. Today however was just lovely.
comment in response to
post
I would say the hearts of many of their supports were it not for the fact that it has felt a fairly loveless union for quite some time.