Profile avatar
henrybollocks.bsky.social
Purveyor of fine wines and cheeses (Capri Sun and Velveeta)
134 posts 40 followers 38 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to post
Godspeed, Senator
comment in response to post
On behalf of me, the only person that speaks for me: shut up.
comment in response to post
youtu.be/iCBL33NKvPA?...
comment in response to post
I don't hate Maher, I dismissed him as a dipshit jerk-off years ago.
comment in response to post
Underground instead of domes, but yeah
comment in response to post
I want them all prosecuted for premeditated war crimes at The Hague, but firing is an excellent way to start
comment in response to post
Bless you
comment in response to post
You are a great example to others
comment in response to post
And plotting war crimes
comment in response to post
Musk pictured here in his giant Elmer Fudd hat
comment in response to post
Dog Day Afternoon 2: Naps Then Dinner
comment in response to post
Musk is a pusillanimous clod
comment in response to post
Human decency is no longer applicable once the opposition has been successfully dehumanized
comment in response to post
I heard there was a secret ooze It turned four turtles into dudes But you don't really care for pizza, do ya? They fought like this, Two swords, a stick A couple sai Some nunchuck tricks Those Ninja boys-a callin Cowabunga
comment in response to post
Typical Musk, couldn't even get that right. I've seen his tweets. Definitely a Nazi.
comment in response to post
I hope he is arrested and deported
comment in response to post
Greenland should have arrested and deported his sorry ass
comment in response to post
The principle of distinction is a fundamental principle of international humanitarian law which provides that parties to an armed conflict must “at all times distinguish between the civilian population and combatants and between civilian objects and military objectives and accordingly shall direct
comment in response to post
anticipated”. In other words, the principle of proportionality seeks to limit damage caused by military operations by requiring that the effects of the means and methods of warfare used must not be disproportionate to the military advantage sought.
comment in response to post
The principle of proportionality prohibits attacks against military objectives which are “expected to cause incidental loss of civilian life, injury to civilians, damage to civilian objects, or a combination thereof, which would be excessive in relation to the concrete and direct military advantage
comment in response to post
Violating either of the principles of proportionality or distinction constitutes a war crime.
comment in response to post
In wartime, is the premeditated blowing up of an entire apartment building filled with families where an alleged terrorist MIGHT BE visiting his girlfriend a war crime?
comment in response to post
I'm concerned that using Signal to transmit classified material to avoid mandated record-keeping is clearly a criminal action, but what really bugs me, and the media is not talking about is the following:
comment in response to post
There was a Superman/He-Man crossover comic in the 80"s, and a Superman/Alien crossover. He-Man/Alien crossover is far overdue, possibly involving the Radio Shack TRS-80 computer kids from the promotional Superman comic and Hostess Fruit Pies
comment in response to post
I know a way to solve this problem, but first a question: Is Copcity insured against fire?
comment in response to post
Lebensraum
comment in response to post
Because international law is not a thing anymore
comment in response to post
The advantage of being an old fat guy is I could fake a plausible heart attack if I were placed in this situation
comment in response to post
In the Battle of Blair Mountain (1921) miners also engaged in combat with 2500 Federal troops and a squadron of bombers.
comment in response to post
Is "DDT" supposed to stand for Donald J. Trump? Genuinely confused.
comment in response to post
In the 1944 Supreme Court case Prince vs. Massachusetts, the majority opinion stated: "Parents may be free to become martyrs themselves. But it does not follow they are free, in identical circumstances, to make martyrs of their children'
comment in response to post
Something, something scalps
comment in response to post
I may have to throttle back on that because it is a family name in Russia.
comment in response to post
*gurgling stomach noises*
comment in response to post
If anyone is looking for news updates from actual under-attack federal workers, the CFPB union posts from @nteu335.bsky.social
comment in response to post
Link to the "public can disregard" t-shirt on your merch store please, I can't find it.
comment in response to post
I'm going to start calling people Krasnov, as in "look at THIS krasnov over here"