ianhussey.mmmdata.io - Profile | ThreadSky | a Reddit-style client for Bluesky

If you asked four people their age in years, the average of their ages could only ever end in .0, .25, .50 or .75. This is the principle underlying GRIM (Granularity-Related Inconsistency of Means), now covered in a new guide for COSIG's first official update! cosig.net GRIM guide: osf.io/67bp4

submitted 1 hour ago • 1 comment

Our paper "A fragmented field" has just been accepted at AMPPS. We find it's not just you, psychology is really getting more confusing (construct and measure fragmentation is rising). We updated the preprint with the (substantial) revision, please check it out. osf.io/preprints/ps...

submitted 5 hours ago • 1 comment

As someone who did some shitposting and confrontation as an ECR, I think ECRs should be able to participate in discourse OR choose to abstain & be shielded. But you can’t have both. You can’t make a name for yourself dunking on others & then plead “no fair, smol bean ECR” when someone QTs you.

submitted 6 hours ago • 1 comment

PCI Psychology is here!! 🎉🥳 After over a year of hard work by so many people, we are thrilled to announce that we are open for submissions! Join us in making publishing more efficient, equitable, and open: psych.peercommunityin.org #PsychSciSky #scipub

submitted 1 day ago • 1 comment

Can we normalise error detection in science? Join @ianhussey.mmmdata.io as he explores how we assess trustworthiness and challenge misconduct in academic work. Register free here tinyurl.com/4un95jwp

submitted 1 day ago • 0 comments

submitted 1 day ago • 3 comments

Let us start 2025 in a positive mood: here are 10 methods things researchers can worry less about in 2025

submitted 172 days ago • 15 comments

Extremely niche shitpost

submitted 1 day ago • 4 comments

Concerns raised about an RCT of Vitamin K2 in JAMA Internal Medicine: www.pubpeer.com/publications...

submitted 2 days ago • 1 comment

‘Anyone can do this’: Sleuths publish a toolkit for post-publication review @averyorrall.bsky.social reports on an initiative from @reeserichardson.bsky.social and colleagues

submitted 9 days ago • 1 comment

Apparent NCI director candidate @weldeiry.bsky.social wants ‘open, respectful’ post-publication peer review while promoting anonymous site that calls sleuths a ‘mob’

submitted 2 days ago • 6 comments

Join me at the University of Witten/Herdecke for research on meta scientific topics, replication work or other fun things :-) as well as teaching some IMO wonderful students short.sg/j/56902143

submitted 2 days ago • 1 comment

submitted 2 days ago • 56 comments

@cosig.net coverage in Nature news! Collection of Open Science Integrity Guides Anyone can do post-publication peer review. Anyone can be a steward of the scientific literature. www.nature.com/articles/d41...

submitted 2 days ago • 2 comments

What a throwback to 2010s replication discourse. Reminder: this was shown not to be the case in either cancer biology or psychology. Science is self-correcting only when we actively correct it. www.cos.io/rpcb www.science.org/doi/10.1126/...

submitted 2 days ago • 2 comments

submitted 2 days ago • 0 comments

Pro tip, folks: if you make a figure for a publication, don’t just hand the copyright over to the publisher. Post it on OSF first and then give yourself permission to use it in the first publication and then all future publications. That way, no permissions issues.

submitted 2 days ago • 16 comments

@ianhussey.mmmdata.io is expressing optimism about improving research.

submitted 6 days ago • 1 comment

God above, there's more www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...

submitted 45 days ago • 1 comment

My guide on GRIM and GRIMMER will be added to COSIG soon. Very cool set of open resources, take a look or get involved!

submitted 9 days ago • 0 comments

Anyone can do post-publication peer review. Anyone can be a steward of the scientific literature. Anyone can do forensic metascience. Anyone can sleuth. That's why we are launching COSIG: the Collection of Open Science Integrity Guides, an open source resource for all of the above. cosig.net

submitted 9 days ago • 4 comments

I am beyond stoked to announce COSIG, the Collection of Open Science Integrity Guides! Have you always wanted to do post-publication peer review/forensic metascience/sleuthing? Start here! cosig.net

submitted 9 days ago • 1 comment

never watched static on the tv i’m saving it for a low point in my life

submitted 10 days ago • 8 comments

Science-integrity project will root out bad medical papers ‘and tell everyone’ Thrilled to announce this new $900,000 project headed by @jamesheathers.bsky.social

submitted 9 days ago • 4 comments

@jamesheathers.bsky.social has won $900k in philanthropic funding to establish The Medical Evidence Project, which will find flawed medical research that costs lives. www.nature.com/articles/d41...

submitted 9 days ago • 0 comments

The following article has been retracted on the basis of my @pubpeer.com comments. Zemestani & Mozaffari (2020) “Acceptance and commitment therapy for the treatment of depression in persons with physical disability: a randomized controlled trial” journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/...

submitted 9 days ago • 0 comments

The original sin of many scholars is treating methods as a mere nuisance rather than an integral part of the scientific process.

submitted 13 days ago • 3 comments

Francesca Gino: "I am deeply sad and disappointed that the University has concluded as it has. But now that this process is over, I am free to show why its conclusion is so clearly wrong. I will continue the fight and do everything in my power to right this wrong." www.linkedin.com/posts/france...

submitted 14 days ago • 2 comments