ianhussey.mmmdata.io - Profile | ThreadSky | a Reddit-style client for Bluesky

PCI Psychology is here!! 🎉🥳 After over a year of hard work by so many people, we are thrilled to announce that we are open for submissions! Join us in making publishing more efficient, equitable, and open: psych.peercommunityin.org #PsychSciSky #scipub

submitted 1 day ago • 1 comment

Can we normalise error detection in science? Join @ianhussey.mmmdata.io as he explores how we assess trustworthiness and challenge misconduct in academic work. Register free here tinyurl.com/4un95jwp

submitted 8 hours ago • 0 comments

submitted 11 hours ago • 3 comments

Let us start 2025 in a positive mood: here are 10 methods things researchers can worry less about in 2025

submitted 171 days ago • 15 comments

Extremely niche shitpost

submitted 15 hours ago • 4 comments

Concerns raised about an RCT of Vitamin K2 in JAMA Internal Medicine: www.pubpeer.com/publications...

submitted 1 day ago • 1 comment

‘Anyone can do this’: Sleuths publish a toolkit for post-publication review @averyorrall.bsky.social reports on an initiative from @reeserichardson.bsky.social and colleagues

submitted 8 days ago • 1 comment

Apparent NCI director candidate @weldeiry.bsky.social wants ‘open, respectful’ post-publication peer review while promoting anonymous site that calls sleuths a ‘mob’

submitted 1 day ago • 6 comments

Join me at the University of Witten/Herdecke for research on meta scientific topics, replication work or other fun things :-) as well as teaching some IMO wonderful students short.sg/j/56902143

submitted 1 day ago • 1 comment

submitted 1 day ago • 56 comments

@cosig.net coverage in Nature news! Collection of Open Science Integrity Guides Anyone can do post-publication peer review. Anyone can be a steward of the scientific literature. www.nature.com/articles/d41...

submitted 1 day ago • 2 comments

What a throwback to 2010s replication discourse. Reminder: this was shown not to be the case in either cancer biology or psychology. Science is self-correcting only when we actively correct it. www.cos.io/rpcb www.science.org/doi/10.1126/...

submitted 1 day ago • 2 comments

submitted 1 day ago • 0 comments

Pro tip, folks: if you make a figure for a publication, don’t just hand the copyright over to the publisher. Post it on OSF first and then give yourself permission to use it in the first publication and then all future publications. That way, no permissions issues.

submitted 2 days ago • 15 comments

@ianhussey.mmmdata.io is expressing optimism about improving research.

submitted 6 days ago • 1 comment

God above, there's more www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...

submitted 44 days ago • 1 comment

My guide on GRIM and GRIMMER will be added to COSIG soon. Very cool set of open resources, take a look or get involved!

submitted 8 days ago • 0 comments

Anyone can do post-publication peer review. Anyone can be a steward of the scientific literature. Anyone can do forensic metascience. Anyone can sleuth. That's why we are launching COSIG: the Collection of Open Science Integrity Guides, an open source resource for all of the above. cosig.net

submitted 8 days ago • 4 comments

I am beyond stoked to announce COSIG, the Collection of Open Science Integrity Guides! Have you always wanted to do post-publication peer review/forensic metascience/sleuthing? Start here! cosig.net

submitted 8 days ago • 1 comment

never watched static on the tv i’m saving it for a low point in my life

submitted 9 days ago • 8 comments

Science-integrity project will root out bad medical papers ‘and tell everyone’ Thrilled to announce this new $900,000 project headed by @jamesheathers.bsky.social

submitted 8 days ago • 4 comments

@jamesheathers.bsky.social has won $900k in philanthropic funding to establish The Medical Evidence Project, which will find flawed medical research that costs lives. www.nature.com/articles/d41...

submitted 8 days ago • 0 comments

The following article has been retracted on the basis of my @pubpeer.com comments. Zemestani & Mozaffari (2020) “Acceptance and commitment therapy for the treatment of depression in persons with physical disability: a randomized controlled trial” journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/...

submitted 9 days ago • 0 comments

The original sin of many scholars is treating methods as a mere nuisance rather than an integral part of the scientific process.

submitted 12 days ago • 3 comments

Francesca Gino: "I am deeply sad and disappointed that the University has concluded as it has. But now that this process is over, I am free to show why its conclusion is so clearly wrong. I will continue the fight and do everything in my power to right this wrong." www.linkedin.com/posts/france...

submitted 14 days ago • 2 comments

@shuhbillskee.bsky.social, Niklas Johannes & I finally submitted our critique of a "new paradigm" in social media effects research for peer-review at Meta-Psychology. If you're interested in reviewing, please submit a review to [email protected] or e.g. prereview.org, or reply here.

submitted 15 days ago • 4 comments

We thank Reviewer 2 for their helpful feedback which has greatly improved the paper

submitted 14 days ago • 3 comments

Harvard university’s top governing board, the Harvard Corporation, decided this month to revoke Francesca Gino’s tenure and end her employment at Harvard Business School www.wgbh.org/news/educati...

submitted 18 days ago • 5 comments

The work of NGS, says Tim Burch, the executive director of the National Society of Professional Surveyors, “is kind of like oxygen. You don’t know you need it until it’s not there."

submitted 17 days ago • 8 comments

Scientists like to blame poorly communicated results on science journalists. This case shows the double standard: 1. When I exaggerate, it's a joke. When you do, it's 'misinformation'. 2. JvB's own tweets about the project didn't explain the methods, highlighted preliminary vibe check results.

submitted 17 days ago • 2 comments

The copyright statement of Elsevier now includes AI training.

submitted 18 days ago • 2 comments