ibrahimtencer.bsky.social
Socionics • Mathematical psychology • Personality types for self-knowledge and personal growth.
Creator of http://sedecology.com, a social network for typology.
32 posts
22 followers
30 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
"You can type someone as a Ni user by what they talk and how they talk etc."
I broadly agree with your point here, we type people by the content of their expressions (Fe) and actions (Se). I guess I'm not really sure what the problem is then — rationality in socionics is different from J/P in MBTI.
comment in response to
post
In socionics all the IMEs are "external" i.e. observable to different degrees, not just the extroverted ones. Observability is determined by which function they occupy: sedecology.blogspot.com/2020/07/the-...
comment in response to
post
?
comment in response to
post
The algorithm is garbage, Twitter's actually promotes intelligent content (if you want it to at least).
comment in response to
post
"writes Kenneth Gergen"
What does the name Kenneth Gergen refer to, if not a unified self?
comment in response to
post
That doesn't make it useful to do underwater.
comment in response to
post
Hence the "underwater" part.
comment in response to
post
Definitely more of a programmer's term for it
comment in response to
post
When people say science is political they mean "you have to allow my political agenda to influence/supersede your research."
comment in response to
post
Fun fact, Unicode refuses to change inaccurate names to preserve backwards-compatibility.
comment in response to
post
They may have the same personality type (EIE)
comment in response to
post
Only when its meaning is recognized.
comment in response to
post
LII
comment in response to
post
Personality tests are notoriously unreliable, it's best to understand the theory (but in the case of MBTI it isn't very coherent anyways).
comment in response to
post
Believe in socionics instead
comment in response to
post
👋
comment in response to
post
Tests are not very effective for any typology. They rely on self-report which is highly prompted and not spontaneous, and shoehorning information into multiple choice responses for ease of calculation.
comment in response to
post
Or socionics.
comment in response to
post
MBTI was designed for the workplace but Enneagram has been "adapted". Its origins have little to do with capitalism, FYI.
comment in response to
post
LII and you?
comment in response to
post
Socionics and MBTI are actually very different -- the IMEs in socionics have very different semantics from the functions in MBTI, despite the similar names. Original MBTI does not even have eight functions.