ivanmaas.bsky.social
Student of International relations, global history and international law.
187 posts
22 followers
49 following
Discussion Master
comment in response to
post
And all of that changed when I played nier.
comment in response to
post
It has been the most important election for like 12 years straight i dont know what to tell you bro. If we still haven't reformed the party after 12 years then that feels like an us problem.
comment in response to
post
It is hardbreaking to see leftist become right of center liberals as they become rich.
comment in response to
post
Man unable to introduce legs to global app, takes on new and different challenge of super computing.
comment in response to
post
"They will have to learn to become self reliant somehow, why not in this way?"
comment in response to
post
This "i am not having a manic episode shirt" is awnersing allot of questions raised by the shirt.
comment in response to
post
Maybe if someone would pack the court, or do like voting bill reform, if it is important enough.
comment in response to
post
Id nuance that too, people find it hard to keep the fiction distinct the moment that they speak it out aloud.
comment in response to
post
Very good
comment in response to
post
The robot will monitor children and their interests and personal situation?
comment in response to
post
"The Nazis entered this war under the rather childish delusion that they were going to bomb everyone else, and nobody was going to bomb them."
comment in response to
post
Historians and philosophers,; nemesis?
comment in response to
post
Wish historians would simply use their understanding of leninism to be a relevant political force.
comment in response to
post
Someone should inform iran before they get the wrong idea.
comment in response to
post
Can't really pull away from a ally when your reliant, which was a reason to want to have the eu reliant on the usa.
comment in response to
post
The REAList case
comment in response to
post
Ment ukraine ofc
comment in response to
post
I disagree with this, just as russias invasion of Iraq has many analogue consequences, so lessons from Iraq are salient here.
Like the question of boots on the ground.
comment in response to
post
Wait what is this, the uk?
comment in response to
post
If you can't defeat a mercenary outfit near the coast on a regionally small area, it does not seem favorable to do so on a much larger scale.
comment in response to
post
Global convention against runic magic, as children lose limbs on former battlefields.
comment in response to
post
Can not yet
comment in response to
post
Man famous for being unable to clean up government's spending data, rewriting all of human knowledge.
comment in response to
post
What about colby, in the past made people think it was smart to listen to him?
comment in response to
post
But what if you hate winning? Not as easy now is it?
comment in response to
post
Well, didnt it?
comment in response to
post
No man, you cant do this.
comment in response to
post
The Iranian people are a religious and hierarchical people, this is a consequence of the Mongolian conquest in 1400...
comment in response to
post
It ushers change for sure
comment in response to
post
But what if you include incalculables? Like more mountainous terrain, no close allied logistical nodes, a more hostile population? It would easily be 4 to 5 times as easy.
comment in response to
post
Sometimes it is just important you do something, anything.
comment in response to
post
What does duty to fix it, mean here, in this context? i don't see a scenario in which isreal could stabilise Iran even if it wanted to even after a successful regime change.
comment in response to
post
Having nietzsche and socrates in the same "funny" is very good.
comment in response to
post
Good thing we have the printing press to circulate this.
comment in response to
post
To be fair leaving, is only immidiate, as in the immidiate cost ends, but long term leaving does not perse leaves a stable and favourable region.
comment in response to
post
Bro ending up in the black.
comment in response to
post
Going one step further, the Afghan military was "bad and defeat-prone," but in the end, the US army was also defeated. Maybe those Afghan units in hindsight had a strong adversary.
comment in response to
post
Should have asked grok
comment in response to
post
My face when usa degrades to like 13th century theology, you are allowed to read later european philosophy.
comment in response to
post
Brother in christ you only appreciate inactivity of ai. Which is not quite the same as appreciating the ai.
comment in response to
post
A potential lesson also for western militaries.
comment in response to
post
I feel like this problem was already mostly solved by placing planes in hangars, the fact Russia hasn't build them in the past 3 years is insane.
comment in response to
post
More money for tanks, to be used 50 years from now (poorly).
comment in response to
post
This shows how elusive the concept of "major power" is.
It is subjective and the people making the analysis always do have an intent.
comment in response to
post
Coincidence of this success after the west said long distance was no longer a matter of concern? They probably had these targets for months.
comment in response to
post
Lawful good (fascist)
comment in response to
post
Me a political scientist dismissively looking at antropologist: any state formation is good.
comment in response to
post
Reminds me of Russia.
comment in response to
post
To be fair, the president is very important and if this would be the case that would be very very bad.
comment in response to
post
When they said trump would be a peace president they ment inner peace.