jeffcarver.bsky.social
69 posts
265 followers
31 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
I wonder what it would look like if the two sets of "body guards" differed on how to proceed if they disagreed with each other? A shootout?
comment in response to
post
I was hoping to retire in a couple of years, but with the way this regime is unfunctioning, looks like I will have to keep working well past my 70th birthday. Luckily I have a job that (for now anyway) isn't government dependent.
comment in response to
post
But, but, I thought there was free speech?
comment in response to
post
Then that means that they must decline any event that is based on whiteness. Did they realize that?
comment in response to
post
And she is too stupid to know to not approach a service dog, uh in service. Fortunately service dogs are trained to ignore such people.
comment in response to
post
And none of the terms in the NOTAM are on the list of forbidden words, which means that someone with some knowledge had a beef with this and raised it to someone to get it changed back. There isn't even a forbidden word to remove!
comment in response to
post
Musk IS the deep state now.
comment in response to
post
If Musk or one of his workers violate a court order to cease, and continue, I assume the judge can rule on contempt and jail them, right? Can the president pardon them for that action?
comment in response to
post
If Musk or one of his workers violate a court order to cease, and continue, I assume the judge can rule on contempt and jail them, right? Can the president pardon them for that action?
comment in response to
post
To function AI uses data, and if you are using AI to do something -to- a system, BY DEFAULT the AI system TAKES all the data it can, proprietary or not, classified or not, private or not. As much as it can access. Security is not considered.
comment in response to
post
And exactly HOW did they get the emails of the judges that are in a separate part of the government with a separate payroll system?
comment in response to
post
Start a rumor that at least one of the Musk minions is actually a double agent for Soros.
comment in response to
post
Isn't lying to Congress something, something, contempt? Is that what those "doctors" did?
comment in response to
post
And get the states involved when it occurs on their watch. Nothing the FFOTUS can do (legally) to stop state prosecution of his cronies.
comment in response to
post
Unelected bureaucrats. Aren't they the deep state "they" were telling us were the bad guys?
comment in response to
post
Probably used a sharpie on the map to make it rain.
comment in response to
post
The only question is how long until MAGA gets buyer's remorse.
comment in response to
post
Amazing that a party that rails against DEI for their perception that people who are not qualified for the position get it because of their diversity, are hiring and appointing people who are clearly not qualified for the position. Well, they might have exactly one "quality", loyalty to the FFOTUS.
comment in response to
post
And yet leaks that support the felon+rapist are good, right? At least that will be the case starting in a couple of weeks.
comment in response to
post
Are we sure that this isn't some sort of brilliant pivot where the felon+rapist is simply testing his syncophants for loyalty? Spew the most ludicrous idea to see who falls in line and who pushes back, to toss the the disloyal under the bus.
comment in response to
post
Well lies don't matter. Again.