jvandieen.bsky.social
Interested in biomechanics and neural control of posture and locomotion.
18 posts
188 followers
62 following
Regular Contributor
Conversation Starter
comment in response to
post
Reply. Yes and to the authors. Perfectly fine to use abbreviations in writing the draft. Search and replace before asking co-authors for feedback please.
comment in response to
post
Sure thing.
comment in response to
post
It is 3*0+3. Assuming you eat the bottle.
comment in response to
post
Stay safe James. Wishing you and your family strength to deal with these terrible events.
comment in response to
post
You also need a scan of Lena to answer this question I guess. And maybe some rules for the fight as constraints.
comment in response to
post
It was.
comment in response to
post
Scan and throw away was my solution. Easier to find them when files are properly named. Bit must admit admit that at the time there was someone happy to do this for me.
comment in response to
post
Sounds like a must read.
comment in response to
post
It is not a direct reflection of ankle moments albeit a reasonable approximation. But what I meant is that the CoP is not of interest in itself. The ankle moments are but even then they are the means to an end (controlling the CoM)
comment in response to
post
I don’t think is is nitpicking. I have seen reviewers and authors suggest that balance control is about COP and even question why one would look at COM. Imo it is about control of the COM relative to the base of support. The COP is an easily measurable byproduct of how the COM is controlled.
comment in response to
post
Really depends on the question and context.
comment in response to
post
Plus, reading that something hasn’t been done before should elicit the thought that there may be very good reasons for that.
comment in response to
post
Thanks Anthony. Can you add me to this list?
comment in response to
post
Thanks Matthieu. Can you add me to this list?