katek0.bsky.social
114 posts
22 followers
98 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
Snyder v. United States
comment in response to
post
this was *two weeks ago*, third way and politico.
in fucking nebraska.
looks like the voting public has a different idea of what conversations are valuable to have!
and maybe for once it’s not “are those loser-ass trans people a little too icky for the full platter of civil rights?”
comment in response to
post
There has never been anything less important than sports and sporting events. To have our existence thrown into question for the sake of these cisgender trivial amusements is the greatest insult.
comment in response to
post
Thanks I appreciate it.
comment in response to
post
How do you find out the Senate parliamentarians ruling on this?
comment in response to
post
Someone rt'd your Maryland prison article months ago, you write well. Keep it up.
comment in response to
post
And ultimately, Chuck Schumer made a "deal" in which the Dems wouldn't fill the spot. So now, instead, Trump's hush-money lawyer is getting a lifetime appointment to the 3rd circuit afj.org/article/circ...
comment in response to
post
thank you, best of luck
comment in response to
post
Smh at the state of civil procedure.
comment in response to
post
How do they have standing to sue when they don't face any harm& haven't.
comment in response to
post
www.youtube.com/watch?v=FYCu...
comment in response to
post
Blue Labour thinks it can strip people of their rights because the biased media wants them too, then say vote for us not Reform or else. You people have broken every promise because you have no principles except which way is the wind blowing. Start looking for a new job. Maybe one with a union.
comment in response to
post
The problem the Democrats face is that they have no deterrence, Republicans aren't afraid that Dems will do 10% of what their doing to them.
comment in response to
post
Conservatism is the belief that people aren't equal and that some people should be able to dominate other people just because of who they are.
comment in response to
post
If you wont even defend yourself because your worried about being a bipartisan centrist how are you going to defend your constituents. Cant she chew gum a walk at the same time.
comment in response to
post
These bigots think they have the right to tell us how to live our lives, & what's best for our health, they should mind their own fucking business.
comment in response to
post
This is all just pretextual to stop people being trans because they don't like people who they perceive as different from them.
comment in response to
post
This is why rational basis review from FCC v. Beach et, where the court just defers to the governments assertations without evaluating the fit between premise & conclusion is inappropriate. Governments have been treating people arbitrarily for thousands of years.
comment in response to
post
Never forget they stole a SCOTUS seat, twice, with Scalia's seat held open for a year then rammed Amy Barrett in a month & the democrats did nothing. They let the republican rob them didn't try to get what was stolen back or replace it by adding a seat.
comment in response to
post
at what point do average people realize RW/GOP etc never wanted to ban GAC cause it doesn't help trans folk live happier healthier lives, but exactly because it DOES and they simply don't want trans people to exist? NO justification to keep ignoring the facts other than bias/bigotry. WAKE UP people!
comment in response to
post
This doesn't have to be this way, imagine if you had a government that was determined to improving the economic situation of the working class, instead of just doing austerity & trickle down economics. How come when budgets are tight its those who have the least who have to pay not the most.
comment in response to
post
They're small government when your a company polluting the environment or a wealthy person avoiding taxes, to everyone else their statist busybodies.
comment in response to
post
No institution is incorruptible when they turn the rules upside down & discriminating against us is equality they just show how empty they are. Self reliance is what we need.
comment in response to
post
Its not a coincidence that SCOTUS weakened Bivens actions, which allows you to sue Feds when they violate your rights, 3 years ago in Egbert v. Boule, & this happens now.
comment in response to
post
He will demonize anyone for his right wing press bosses.
comment in response to
post
Could you pls dm me I need to switch to injectable estradiol, from my blue 887/2 pill & Dr wont help, & I need a safe DIY option?
comment in response to
post
Who actually voted for a Blue Labour?
www.thepinknews.com/2025/05/21/l...
comment in response to
post
Notice the Telegraph says because of their supposed class & race their identity isn't real, they do what they accuse you of doing.
comment in response to
post
How can that be you don't need Lie algebra or PDEs to describe it.
comment in response to
post
Defund this Quango.
comment in response to
post
I'm referring to para 171"Although the word “biological” does not appear in this definition, the ordinary meaning of those plain and unambiguous words corresponds with the biological characteristics that make an individual a man or a woman. These are assumed to be self-explanatory..."
comment in response to
post
To clarify at para 6"A person who is a biological man, ie
who was at birth of the male sex"