l8nm.bsky.social
User Researcher in UKGov
Pro swimmer. Amateur parent. Terrible runner.
23 posts
51 followers
109 following
Regular Contributor
Conversation Starter
comment in response to
post
I was reading about dual-track agile yesterday off the back of a xgov chat.
I'd be interested to know how these approaches are discussed in service assessments. Your post helps shape the required narrative
I liked the way Ha yesterday distinguished between:
Build to learn
Build. Then learn.
comment in response to
post
❤️ Great timing Steve, I've been struggling to articulate this for the last couple of weeks. Thank you.
comment in response to
post
We've used similar template prompts in a tool we've been testing. We haven't spotted any incorrect responses or hallucinations/Bullshit in sessions yet. But it still hasn't stopped inconsistent respones
comment in response to
post
This is lovely. Also, 'GovCrush' is amazing. I think I have a few of these haha
comment in response to
post
Haha! Mad skillz
comment in response to
post
I think I speak on behalf of all User Researchers in saying listening to your own voice in a session is the WORST.
comment in response to
post
I didnt know her well but followed her insightful thoughts and ideas for years. The civil service and the general public have, and will continue to, benefit from her generousity. Gutted to lose such an awesome leader x
comment in response to
post
That's the strapline for 2024
comment in response to
post
This comes back to having Assurance gates near the end of each phase to prevent this stuff from progressing
comment in response to
post
So many other competing demands on consultancies so I can see why this happens.Looking to secure furthering funding just to stay alive in this market but also constantly looking to build their portfolio/org CV to secure other contracts.Result is pet projects they can point to, e.g. a shiny AI thing
comment in response to
post
Also, download thr citymapper app. It's loads better than Google maps at directing you around London
comment in response to
post
Nice one babs
comment in response to
post
I like these questions at the end, and would add 'level' to frequency, impact and cost. How wrong could the tool be? What happens if there's an absence of info for the tool to find? Lots of internal testing to do
comment in response to
post
This is interesting! Are you evaluating specific interventions, or evaluating if early interventions are effective generally?
comment in response to
post
For context, it was my way of separating types of content. One for football, one for work, one for Switch, etc. I'm having a go at merging everything on this app, but it's already stressing me out
comment in response to
post
Just needs Ronald and Hamburgler cosplayers to complete the 80's vibe