lancewiggs.bsky.social
Aotearoa New Zealand
Punakaiki Fund. Climate Venture Capital Fund.
116 posts
652 followers
692 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
..or for years…
comment in response to
post
Luckily @jamesblunt.com isn't active on Bluesky.
comment in response to
post
No - they did all the other car park buildings too.
comment in response to
post
Keep fighting entropy, the enemy.
comment in response to
post
mm/ too Christian, even if Celtic.
comment in response to
post
I’ve been looking into how to remove the logos. Opportunity for a logo replacement product.
comment in response to
post
www.nzta.govt.nz/roadcode/gen...
😂 But not under NZ regulations
comment in response to
post
Pedal /engine powered vehicles fall under another category. Needs to be very low power.
comment in response to
post
No sense at all.
comment in response to
post
Possibly the loss of revenue from car parks buildings that are full. If that happens. Chargenet charge for the service
comment in response to
post
Indeed.
comment in response to
post
It lost me in the first scene when the spaceships made sounds like badly tunes 50s American cars.
comment in response to
post
It falls under moped, not motorcycle rules, and does fine in 50km zones but is not for high speed roads.
It’s pretty tiny irl.
comment in response to
post
I’ve been on two (in particular) in different orgs where people reached that conclusion. In both cases (one in Aussie and one in Europe) the organisation was wholly supportive of people’s decisions to leave. It was awesome to see.
comment in response to
post
Happy to help when it comes to looking at business financial data
comment in response to
post
Is there data breaking down these outlier stats by the types of businesses?
Surely there is something about real estate in there?
comment in response to
post
Gah NZH really needs to fix the need to repeatedly login.
Anyway - trading insolvently is a thing where the board assumes a funder will invest and suddenly pulls the pin. Directors need to have an agreement with the funder. Auditors look for that now.
Arguably a case to answer.
comment in response to
post
They started with 2m paid subs and ended with 3m, so that’s say $10/year per sub on average. Does that make sense?
Most appear to be $5-10/month, not per year, so $23m in net revenue would make more sense, even so the multiple is nuts.
comment in response to
post
$50,000 per year over 10 years, and when you divide that between the 3 payers it’s barely a night out in the Viaduct 🥸
comment in response to
post
That looks dreadful!
comment in response to
post
The only security risk is the risk that the US car industry, as covered well in WSJ, NYTimes, is going to lose badly to better and cheaper cars from SE Asia.
Again.
comment in response to
post
I guess you’ve just always been years ahead of the pack…
comment in response to
post
Except it’s well controlled here, through self-regulation. Absolutely not in the USA.
comment in response to
post
Interesting bike. I found the website and it only says max speed <100kmph. What is the max speed/motorway performance like in practice?
comment in response to
post
Agreed. PHEVs bring the worst of both worlds, not the best, and are an interim technology.
comment in response to
post
Depends on how they use them. Used as designed they are EV for computing and petrol only for long trips, and they’ll be paying lower rates than pure EV.
I have no issues with the fees - it incentivizes using the PHEV as an EV.