matt-hew.bsky.social
I love cars, stories, photos, tech & toast. A geek who loves learning from all I meet. I believe diversity is a state of mind not a religion. I believe in one less god than monotheists. I challenge the status quo. Worried for my children’s world.
145 posts
49 followers
43 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
US Marshalls would be ones to arrest Trump too
If he refused to leave office
I see the play here
comment in response to
post
They would be ones to arrest Trump too
If he refused to leave office
I see the play here
comment in response to
post
There we go. I don’t believe this crap for one min. It’s all a control play.
comment in response to
post
Something is afoot. Rand, Fox News… all of them are why he’s here. He/Project 2025 said this was gonna happen. This has to be intentional whip sawing to try and control us
comment in response to
post
All these fuckers are why this is happening. What game is this? Seriously? What an I missing? Because something else is going on here.
comment in response to
post
comment in response to
post
He also said this before pausing the tariffs...
comment in response to
post
Yup reckon so
comment in response to
post
Did Trump short the market for his friends??? I’d like to see who got richer today. And yes, he can do it again.
comment in response to
post
And I bet he put $$$$ yesterday
comment in response to
post
It’s Trump’s Liquor cabinet that’s why!!!
comment in response to
post
Trump’s Liquor cabinet ammirite?
comment in response to
post
Yeah WTF!? Cmon folks
comment in response to
post
And activate his militias
comment in response to
post
Trumps Liquor Cabinet strikes again
comment in response to
post
More like Trump’s Liquor Cabinet 😵💫
comment in response to
post
Well said
comment in response to
post
Why top execs are using Signal. Hit the nail on the head.
comment in response to
post
Were all of the top 10 scrutinized?
comment in response to
post
Just a reminder that it’s Venezuelans now. Tomorrow it might be someone else. But the day after it could be you or me. This is how fascism creeps
comment in response to
post
But they look soooooo coooool lol
comment in response to
post
Besides, in a country of no law and no constitution there is no law to break in destroying property. MooGA want their cake and eat it. Silly twats.
comment in response to
post
Top inside, bottom inside… etc
comment in response to
post
It’s fascinating that the moment real discussion starts, people engage just enough to appear serious—then shift to another post to dunk on ‘computationalists.’ Almost like there’s more interest in performing ideological purity than actually exploring the topic. 🤔 Love, Your ‘Computationalist’
comment in response to
post
p.s. Always good to hear other perspectives—let’s see where the next decade takes us 😉
comment in response to
post
This conversation highlights the bigger debate: is AI’s evolution fast enough to challenge older frameworks, or are we still fundamentally constrained by its lack of embedded world experience? I lean toward acceleration, but I’m open to counterpoints with evidence.
comment in response to
post
If LLMs are ‘just probabilistic’ and nothing more, does that mean you reject probabilistic models in neuroscience as well? The human brain is also probabilistic in many ways, yet we don’t dismiss it as meaningless computation.
comment in response to
post
It’s interesting how different our perspectives on AI’s development are. I see it as a rapidly evolving system with complex emergent behaviors, whereas you seem to view it as fundamentally limited by today’s architecture. That’s an important distinction.
comment in response to
post
It’s not my fault you missed my point. The relevance is clear—to your comment, thread, and broader discussion. Mirror neurons, evolution, AI’s ability to simulate social cues all connect. Invoking agents only weakens your argument—unless you think orchestrating models makes AI less capable, not more
comment in response to
post
But my fav is assumption + insult. Thanks for the laugh
comment in response to
post
Oh the insults are out!
comment in response to
post
Couple of iterations 😂 his book was PUBLISHED in 2019 my OOM comment was anchored in this alone. Project from now and his books observation unravel even further. His vision is constricted and grounded in and out dated speed of technological development
comment in response to
post
Does Smith not argue that for AI to judge it must incorporate a richer, more context-aware understanding of the world? That we should train AI to understand in neuroscience inspired reinforcement learning? This tech isn’t “baked.” AI growth alone is several OOMs since publication of his book
comment in response to
post
It doesn’t mean that a computer can’t act in a way that helps us, that makes us feel better about ourselves. Tools come in all shapes and forms. They may not feel anxiety but that doesn’t mean they can’t help alleviate it in is. It doesn’t mean they can’t help us be more empathetic.
comment in response to
post
Is shame not an evolutionary mechanism to protect our long term social standing in the group by preventing future similar choices? If we feel the gut sink of shame does that data not get recalled and acted upon? Does a chimp feel shame? A monkey? Lemur? Shrew? Platypus? Monitor lizard?
comment in response to
post
Emotions are a conceptual interpretation of physical sensations. Feeling is felt in the body. If we feel loved who wins? If we feel empathy who wins? If a sociopath feels nothing but fakes empathy with no other end goal other than the recipient feeling loved is that a bad thing?