Profile avatar
mcsnee.bsky.social
DC and Maine. πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦ Lawyer, drawyer, character flawyer. I don't argue with mouthbreathing idiots for free, so MAGAts will be cheerfully blocked. Crypto is a scam, and AI can fuck right off.
652 posts 854 followers 856 following
Getting Started
Active Commenter
comment in response to post
Just saw the God's Junk Drawer cover in your newsletter. Obviously was going to read it regardless! But also going to EXTRA read it now!
comment in response to post
I just bled out laughing 😡
comment in response to post
It is *absolutely not.*
comment in response to post
This sounds SUPER FUCKING FAKE. Like, not even a little bit believable. Dumb AI shit is dumb AI shit even when it's anti-Trump dumb AI shit
comment in response to post
Consider just ... not watching Amazon Prime. There's a lot of other, better content out there, and absolutely nothing essential on their shitty video service.
comment in response to post
I am *selfishly* sad about not getting to catch up with your book tour and sympathetically sad you'll miss the Frick, but I 100% agree it's the correct decision. (And as a Red Sox fan, always happy for the Yankees to have one fewer butt in the seats.)
comment in response to post
And if your light doesn't work, a spoon will do in a pinch.
comment in response to post
Well, you know what they say--if tariffs are outlawed, only outlaws will have tariffs.
comment in response to post
At least let him pee first.
comment in response to post
Automatic follow for this
comment in response to post
I've been to Cuba. It's a beautiful country that represses the fuck out of its citizens *and* is crumbling to dust.
comment in response to post
It's a political philosophy that has failed spectacularly to achieve its goals every time it's been tried--and that invites "no true scotsman" fallacies left and right.
comment in response to post
I understand your point and the assumptions you're basing it on. Take care!
comment in response to post
Nah, I'm just not interested in engaging in the debate you want to have over your preferred political philosophy. Knock yourself out, though!
comment in response to post
Mmhmm.
comment in response to post
Mmhmm.
comment in response to post
Shitty AI pictures are always shitty AI pictures.
comment in response to post
Okay!
comment in response to post
And yet: still more successful than Marxism. πŸ˜‚
comment in response to post
Nah.
comment in response to post
Why?
comment in response to post
... because doctors also have friends and family and sometimes share expenses?
comment in response to post
Mark: you've got a big megaphone. Fucking use it better.
comment in response to post
Weird. A whole lot of the associates at MY big law firm are from middle-class or poorer families, and we're all pretty fucking pissed off at the regime. Honey.
comment in response to post
First time I've agreed with you in the #2 Trump regime.
comment in response to post
Campaign in text messages, govern in Bazooka comics?
comment in response to post
It had aged badly by eight years ago when Trump was spitting secrets to Russia in the oval office.
comment in response to post
@chelliepingree.bsky.social is ON FIRE talking about the Trump regime's overreach.
comment in response to post
Senator Adam SCHIF?
comment in response to post
Google Docs is not a tool
comment in response to post
So we'll need to sue in every judicial district in the US? Well, full employment for lawyers, but it seems like the DOJ will run out of line attorneys to fight them.
comment in response to post
Start with Gabz. Where was she on this national intelligence that she's supposed to direct?
comment in response to post
Our friends are wiser than we are, and though it hurts them and us, they know when it's time to let us open our hearts to new friends. Scamp is a hero, and he is looking back so pleased that you brought Normandy home.
comment in response to post
This would be better with some guacamole, but only if the guac had peas in it
comment in response to post
I mean, Pontius Pilate...
comment in response to post
But in a larger sense who among us has not invited a journalist into discussions of classified war plans
comment in response to post
"Lol the libs owned us JOKeS oN THeM for ReaDInG"
comment in response to post
UNITARY FUCKING EXECUTIVE, except when it's not convenient
comment in response to post
At least in the US, I doubt this will be an issue going forward, because renewable energy credits are woke. Or Marxist. Or, probably, DEI, somehow.
comment in response to post
Um, no. (1) I didn't ask you, and (2) this is entirely irrelevant to the question I asked.
comment in response to post
Crazy that this 60-year-old US senator's kids can't already read or write.