meredithmeredith.bsky.social
President of Signal, Chief Advisor to AI Now Institute
298 posts
69,308 followers
811 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
đ recognize đ
comment in response to
post
Maria, you're the best <3
comment in response to
post
don't need a neologism where regular words suffice
comment in response to
post
The need that would be served would be the need to say you put AI into Signal
comment in response to
post
Source: www.theguardian.com/technology/2...
comment in response to
post
...he says to Signal's president
comment in response to
post
Which users? The ones making the choice, or the ones that the ones making the choice are talking to?
I also don't believe that turning data over "for future use according to ever-shifting ToS" can be counted as "fully informed" but that's another thing
comment in response to
post
No â¤ď¸
comment in response to
post
Yeah, no, we couldn't without WA raising their privacy bar significantly so we're not turning over Signal user data to Meta in the name of interop.
comment in response to
post
Knows IETF bylaws by heart and assumes they're followed
comment in response to
post
Register here: www.helloasso.com/associations...
comment in response to
post
Ahem. Yeah. TY redid it.
comment in response to
post
And in our most read post of the year đ, @meredithmeredith.bsky.social explained her resistance to the TikTok Ban by reflecting on the dangers of further concentrating global surveillance and propaganda power in the hands of the United States.
comment in response to
post
Yeah. That's different than claiming a vulnerability in the tech.
comment in response to
post
See our statement here: bsky.app/profile/sign...
comment in response to
post
Signal is open source so our code is regularly scrutinized in addition to regular formal audits. We constantly monitor [email protected] for any new reports & act on them quickly while working to protect the people who rely on us from outside threats like phishing with warnings and safeguards. 7/
comment in response to
post
In order to help protect people from falling victim to sophisticated phishing attacks, Signal introduced new user flows and in-app warnings. This work has been completed for some time and is unrelated to any current events. 5/
comment in response to
post
Phishing isnât new, and itâs not a flaw in our encryption or any of Signalâs underlying technology. Phishing attacks are a constant threat for popular apps and websites. 4/
comment in response to
post
The memo used the term âvulnerabilityâ in relation to Signalâbut it had nothing to do with Signalâs core tech. It was warning against phishing scams targeting Signal users. 3/
comment in response to
post
One piece of misinfo we need to address is the claim that there are âvulnerabilitiesâ in Signal. This isnât accurate. Reporting on a Pentagon advisory memo appears to be at the heart of the misunderstanding: npr.org/2025/03/25/n.... 2/
comment in response to
post
Yes, you really should use nicknames, a feature we have.
comment in response to
post
â¤ď¸