michaelcohen.us
Founder and CEO of Cohen Research Group and Publisher of Congress in Your Pocket | Author of MODERN POLITICAL CAMPAIGNS | Adjunct Professor at Johns Hopkins University and NYU | Triple UF Alumnus đ #GoGators
http://linktr.ee/michaelcohen
412 posts
1,235 followers
420 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
19/10
comment in response to
post
The obvious answer is Amazon. Prime doesnât need to deliver subscribers because they deliver for the brand.
comment in response to
post
The most Susan Collins thing ever
comment in response to
post
Rare W by the NYT
comment in response to
post
Also, their last real candidate is, well, dead. Sends a message.
comment in response to
post
Say the thing: THE FLORIDA GATORS WILL WIN THE NCAA MENS HOOPS CHAMPIONSHIP
comment in response to
post
One amendment: real elections in Russia, too.
comment in response to
post
Theyâre not even hiding the corruption.
comment in response to
post
âMightâ ???
comment in response to
post
StoryGraph is a solid app and a worthy alternative to Goodreads.
comment in response to
post
If Biden were still POTUS, @petebuttigieg.bsky.social would be on Capitol Hill answering for his âcrimes.â
comment in response to
post
If Biden were still POTUS, @petebuttigieg.bsky.social would be on Capitol Hill answering for his âcrimes.â
comment in response to
post
Both are SO great
comment in response to
post
Like the mug says âŠ
comment in response to
post
đŻ
comment in response to
post
đ
comment in response to
post
Fantastic squad.
comment in response to
post
đ Favorite team?
comment in response to
post
Thanks, Forrest. It was quite a battle. My wife is a total badass and beat it now six years but we almost lost her at one point mid-chemo. It really changes how you look at a lot of things, including news about cancer. Even well-intentioned docs have conflicting views on treatment.
comment in response to
post
Trolling is lazy. I, for one, think we owe it to followers and passers by to show why we are making a claim. Yes, we can always Google a source but what about conflicting sources? To me, that's the more interesting piece here. What did the author see that brought him/her/they to the conclusion?
comment in response to
post
đ«Ą Thanks, Molly.
comment in response to
post
"Mazikeen" has such high expectations of herself that her bio says she's "Enjoying hell on earth."
Meanwhile, my champion is Opus, one of GOAT characters of all-time. I'll go with the bowtie. FWIW, I'm not dazed but am certainly confused by the troll.
Happily, moving on.
comment in response to
post
Agreed, and thank you.
One thing you learn over and over again as a Ph.D. is to cite your sources.
It doesnât really matter that I can find âsomethingâ related to this.
What matters here is the intent of the original poster and what information it was based upon.
I just wanted to learn more.
comment in response to
post
I read the Splinter article. It does not show the content of the email, doesnât say at what level people are being fired, and doesnât give any context on what kind of research might be impacted due to the firings. To the dunkers, Iâm interested in this because my wife is a Stage IV cancer survivor.
comment in response to
post
Thanks, Forrest thatâs exactly what I was going for there.
There is a lot of misinformation flying around and am truly interested in where people get their data.
I wonât post something without a link. Folks should come to their own POVs from the same set of facts.
I donât hide my name, either.
comment in response to
post
Link?
comment in response to
post
Decline is a choice and here is one of the consequences.
comment in response to
post
Support @apnews.com
comment in response to
post
Go Gators!
comment in response to
post
đ·