minimalinteraction.bsky.social
43 posts
34 followers
78 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
This is certainly better, but whoever wrote "pro-vaccine groups" should at the least be off of script approval duties.
comment in response to
post
comment in response to
post
Poor Nick... but everyone is getting hit by tariffs I suppose.
comment in response to
post
Banning pushing ball carriers as a whole would be acceptable.
comment in response to
post
If they want to ban pushing ball carriers as a whole... fine. Targeting a specific instance because a couple of teams - Bills and Eagles - have the players to be highly successful is just an effort to make those teams less effective and ridiculous.
comment in response to
post
"Sparked," you're sure that's the appropriate word to go with here?
comment in response to
post
"It is not a clean CR" or continuing resolution, he said. "It is deeply partisan. It doesn't address far too many of this country's needs, but I believe allowing Donald Trump to take even much more power in a government shutdown is a far worse option."
abcnews.go.com/Politics/sen...
comment in response to
post
But to be fair... Biden was coming in after the economy tanked and Trump is coming in after four years of growth.
comment in response to
post
A little crazy honestly... I think we all knew Milton and Sweat were gone. Slay wasn't shocking, nor was Berks. It seemed like there was a chance to get Rodgers back. CJGJ however, that's a surprise.
comment in response to
post
The simple answer is selfishness. The reason people worry about changing the present when they travel back in time is self-preservation. They don't want to do something that would make it so they were never born. Time travel however is really just dimensional travel, so they needn't worry.
comment in response to
post
People need to take what joy they can where they can find it. Some people have little else to smile about these days.
comment in response to
post
A desperate attempt to encourage Trump to embrace norms since Trump's about to be in complete control?
comment in response to
post
The offense actually worked with Foles, and for about two games with Sanchez.
comment in response to
post
The context was that Trump was trying to overturn his loss in the state as part of a wider effort to overturn his election loss as a whole.
comment in response to
post
About 9,000 rushing yards.
If he had the same amount of carries and but had the 5.8 average he's had with the Eagles this year, it would be 6,965 yards. Throw on the 2,005 he's at right now, and it's roughly 8,970.
comment in response to
post
I imagine some team will at least put in a call about him this offseason.
comment in response to
post
Now this is a good stance for an article, Les! Co-MVPs for the first time in decades
www.espn.com/nfl/news/sto...
comment in response to
post
Also, it's a trailer. Wait until you see the actual movie before deciding its quality.
comment in response to
post
Still need that fifth win against the AFC for it to really matter
comment in response to
post
And yet it could be used to discourage members of the Jan. 6 committee from accepting preemptive pardons to avoid Trump's promise of retribution.
comment in response to
post
Actually, I thought season 3 was by far the worst. I stopped watching there.
comment in response to
post
comment in response to
post
Any analysis of Hurts' impact absolutely has to include his rushing ability, as that is one of the things that separates him from the pack.
It should not be included in the evaluation of the passing game as a whole. That would excuse both the players and coaches due to an individual play by Hurts.
comment in response to
post
Nakobe Dean had a good game. Honestly, I thought most of offensive player were fine, but Hurts was terrible and brought the entire team down. Thankfully he didn't turn the ball over and was able to bust a long run and connect with Smith on a wide-open deep ball. Otherwise, this is probably a loss.
comment in response to
post
And I definitely will not be following someone with a take this unbelievably stupid.
comment in response to
post
Wouldn't it be more like saying the Titanic was a boat? Technically correct, but a massive understatement that lacks the context of what happened to the vessel?
comment in response to
post
Rice never played again. While it is true that he was initially suspended for two games, the suspension was extended to an indefinite one.
www.nfl.com/news/ray-ric...
www.pro-football-reference.com/players/R/Ri...
comment in response to
post
For anyone who is actually wondering, it's basically impossible. The Eagles had 72 defensive plays on Sunday. The Jets would have to average more than three times that in each of the team's last five games. That doesn't even touch on Reddick needing 2 sacks per game, which is also quite a lot.
comment in response to
post
The Ravens did score a TD on the team's final possession. While it was a meaningless score, and was aided by an egregious offensive hold on Jackson's long run, it did happen.