Profile avatar
mtcicero24.bsky.social
8 posts 5 followers 11 following
Prolific Poster
comment in response to post
Trouble is, the bigoted squirt would be quite proud of that legacy, as would (I suspect) most LNP adherents...
comment in response to post
4/4 😡encouraged Canberra bashing incl by refusing to live at the Lodge & cutting 11,000 public service jobs 😡made lying OK with 'core' & 'non-core' promises 😡systematically removed the moderate part of the liberal 'broad church', and 😡made us a smaller, meaner and more divided nation. #auspol
comment in response to post
3/4 😡appointed GG Peter Hollingworth 😡refused to set up a royal commission into child sexual abuse saying it would only put money in the pockets of lawyers 😡gave large funding increases to private schools at the expense of public schools 😡politicised the public service, sacking 6 Dept heads #auspol
comment in response to post
2/4 😡sabotaged the republic referendum 😡changed the marriage act to specifically prohibit same-sex unions 😡squandered the mining boom instead of establishing a sovereign wealth fund 😡gave unsustainable tax cuts skewed towards the rich to buy votes 😡infrastructure pork barrelling #auspol
comment in response to post
Exactly so... Another mis-hit by the NACC. So was the NACC lying by omission to the Inspector?
comment in response to post
"...an honest living" perhaps?
comment in response to post
Nonsense, with all due respect. So we are to allow lawyers to walk away from the law and the Rule of Law and use their subjective judgment as to what outcome satisfies the test of 'Justice' instead? You can't be serious.
comment in response to post
Australia should not buy defence equipment from ANY country simply because they are a country of preference. Australia should buy defence equipment that suits Australia's needs. And by ANY measure, the #AUKUS mess suits NONE of Australia's needs. It suits the US need for bases in Australia. #auspol
comment in response to post
How does anyone who is ineligible under the Constitution remain a candidate for the Electoral College to consider?