neonthotsky.bsky.social
Dad. Australian. Queer. Anarcho-Communist. Intersectionalist. Community Development Worker. Sport lover (not golf). WW2 History Nerd. Board gamer. ADHD haverer.
Times publicly mistaken for Luc Longley: 3.
866 posts
414 followers
228 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
I've been wracking my brain, and the only animal I can see falling for Trump's shit ... Is humans.
comment in response to
post
Dogs would never.
comment in response to
post
Yes, we do. That I'll concede.
comment in response to
post
Yes. Because they want a world where the powerful get to determine who's a person and who's not. This is their goal.
And they'll use dehumanisation to justify monstrous crimes.
comment in response to
post
Much stollen, very thefft
comment in response to
post
Imagine warning a Jewish person about the dangers of dehumanisation?
I reckon they already know.
comment in response to
post
No. That's not what I'm saying. Make all the jokes about incels you like, but don't normalize discourse around dehumanising anyone, because that only encourages them to push things further.
comment in response to
post
I hear that, but you're still airing conditions where someone gets dehumanized.
comment in response to
post
They fundamentally can't. They believe in maintaining a hierarchy of privilege, just like conservatives. Their only difference is how people traverse the ladder.
comment in response to
post
Ease up. That's their rhetoric and it's incredibly dangerous.
Never, never, never dehumanise people.
comment in response to
post
900mm* let's not go crazy 🤣
comment in response to
post
Nah, you know what, he wanted to be the first man on Mars, let's make it happen.
comment in response to
post
And yet he supposedly won all swing states and literally EVERY county that flipped?
Yeah, nah.
www.thenumbersarewrong2024.com/all-topics
comment in response to
post
I get to use the same meme again, yay.
1. Workers risk life & limb, capital holders risk becoming like the rest of us (or nothing if limited liability)
1a. That risk attenuates to $0 once profits exceed starting capital
2. *A* return is fine. Perpetual, ever increasing returns aren't
comment in response to
post
This is Milo and Otis all over again
comment in response to
post
Three inches, aggregate.
comment in response to
post
😂😂😂😂😂😂
Nice!
comment in response to
post
I swear I read somewhere, a Republican being quoted as saying "We're much better prepared than 2020", but I'm having trouble finding it now.
comment in response to
post
Add this recent red flag analysis to the many others citing essentially the same: voter data manipulation
ktla.com/business/pre...
comment in response to
post
Nah.
The dictator's second most effective weapon is totalitarianism. Their most effective weapon is suspended totalitarianism, pending compliance; ideally raised slowly over months or years.
Making him act and dramatically raise the stakes, before people acclimatize, is the way to unmask him
comment in response to
post
Hahahaha, yes!
comment in response to
post
THEN STOP TALKING TO FAT AUSTALIAN COMMUNISTS AND GET IT 🤦
Also, the spiny hairs part was sweet too. You noticed she'd shaved, that's cute. Genuinely.
Fair warning, you've probably shown your hand about how bad you've got it for her tho..
comment in response to
post
Supply? Dude isn't even PAYING these fucking clowns.
comment in response to
post
I think that's oversimplifying it.
From what you've said, you said a very sweet thing, which awoke the dysphoria, and the dysphoria hurt her. Have empathy for the hurt, but please don't regret what you said.
comment in response to
post
Trans or cis we all need to reconcile our ideal selves with our actual selves, and to love who we are.
Expecting lovers/friends to walk on eggshells is a race to the bottom; and a high speed race at that.
comment in response to
post
I get that, but the thing about insecurities is they grow like Nazis when appeased.
There's nothing wrong with what you said, and while their reaction was regrettable, it was THEIR reaction.
comment in response to
post
What a terrible day to have eyes...
comment in response to
post
Sack her. Now. This is disgusting.
comment in response to
post
You didn't say anything wrong there. You told your partner something you love about what they do, and about their body. I don't feel it's something you should feel bad about.
comment in response to
post
Just like Hitler, Musk has his Brown Shirts. Only, in Musk's case, the shirts started off white.
comment in response to
post
The trouble with that argument is Not Ever Doing a Thing and Eventually Doing a Thing spend most of their lifetimes being entirely identical to one another, and it's impossible to whether someone is actively doing one or the other until they stop.
I drew a graph.
comment in response to
post
Yes, it's a TV series, not a movie. Fight me.
comment in response to
post
Trump is opposite to Bush in one respect. Bush is, reportedly, more intelligent than his public persona would suggest.