ponteineptique.bsky.social
Digital humanists, loves python, making data, talking to data, reusing data.
Researcher @ ALMAnaCh, Inria Paris.
107 posts
733 followers
217 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
Pas avec les consoles, mais par contre, le tir au pigeon cs ou le cache cache warcraft 3...
comment in response to
post
Quelle période. J'avais deux jeux compatibles réseau mais pas d'adsl 😅
comment in response to
post
Le jeu de voiture de quand j'étais ado. Les courses d'endurance où on laissait la console tourner et où on se relayait avec mon père sur la pause midi...
comment in response to
post
I will
comment in response to
post
Just in case, because it seems most people do not see notifications on bsky, I sent you a PM about this :D
comment in response to
post
Ça et Green Arrow de la même époque *chef kiss*
comment in response to
post
The question, run de O'Neil. Vraiment bien de bout en bout. Plus polar et vigilante sur super hero
comment in response to
post
Ma lecture, lente, de The Question c'est ma dernière claque. C'est lourd...
comment in response to
post
Warning, I am not a xman fan (except for x23)
comment in response to
post
One day, we need to share notes about our common reading passion.
comment in response to
post
(I hope it's clear I am using a debate and cordial tone for discussion, I have zero intent to create a heated debate 😅)
comment in response to
post
That I completely understand, but it also feels weird to evaluate based on promises, and in a world of open review and non anonymous ones, this can also lead to a worst effect: trusting promises based on the name.
Honestly, I'd rather not have promises for conference.
comment in response to
post
Nlp works this way, and you have preprint. This is completely in line with the open review approach of DH I think
comment in response to
post
IF it ends up meaning better quality for the conference, then it would be better yes.
It would also allow for a better archival of production in the context of DH (abstract can be very light compared to the full presentation, which makes knowing what was said complicated...)
comment in response to
post
I have had a much better time reviewing CHR or NLP4DH papers, even not very good ones, because it's easier to argue over finished and completely described papers...
comment in response to
post
On this note, I wish DH moved away from abstract towards full paper submission, because declaration of intentions are complicated to deal with and lead to paper with potentially unfair evaluation because it was hard to evaluate "promises" or space limited proposals.
comment in response to
post
At the cost of exchanges between data builders, data users, tool builders and tool users, between the more technical / computational approaches will prefer conferences with more overall quality in its submission.
comment in response to
post
On another note, we are starting to consider DHy stuff that is definitely less and less digit./computational. If the community goes to this direction, that's its choice of course.
But I am afraid that the 2019 schism operated with computational humanities (CHR) or NLP4DH is gonna widen even more...
comment in response to
post
To be clear, if your paper does not fit diversity, you can lose at least 7 points (3 points = more or less no diversity). I don't understand this.
But I do value that the paper supporting diversity, through authors or thematic, should be valued.
comment in response to
post
It's not the only thing that is a little weird lately with DH. But yes, as a reviewer, when diversity is not part of the paper, "downgrading" the note because this is about European 20th century without any specific other marker seems a bit sad. I would prefer it to be a bonus only.
comment in response to
post
comment in response to
post
So, this worked, but as docker_container and not docker_swarm_service, which seems to use the hostvar of the manager :)
comment in response to
post
Should have put #ansible as a hashtag...
comment in response to
post
When I deploy, even if I provide the GID as a host-specific var, it seems to be overridden by the Swarm manager GID, resulting in the image not running properly (because it does not have read access to a resource it needs access to...)
Any feedback is appreciated :)
comment in response to
post
Before manuscripts, I am interested in finding people who would like to work in this direction. The data is secondary right now :)
comment in response to
post
Hi :) Right now, we have one Old English text if I remember correctly, but I'd love to get a little more 12-15th century English manuscript in the dataset we have :)
comment in response to
post
And I meant that in a positive way, as I realise it could be read in a different fashion 😁
comment in response to
post
It's always special to me to come back to KCL as it was where I got my first job and is definitely what pushed me towards research rather than engineering...