pwarren.bsky.social
I am a (sometime) economist to studies people lying on the internet.
51 posts
164 followers
242 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
I had to stop listening. His take on "Elon is just replacing all these people with AI" is so disconnected with reality that I wondered why I should listen to anything else he had to say.
comment in response to
post
Yes... when Congress doesn't stand up for itself, it's hard for outsiders to stand up for it.
comment in response to
post
Maybe I'm bi***d, but I think it's a pr*v**** to be inc****d in it.
comment in response to
post
We need to give Oprea a chance to reply, right?
comment in response to
post
Typically, that just means tenured.
comment in response to
post
And has been... FOREVER. I used that dataset to write a paper in 2010.
comment in response to
post
I don't know what "correct price of the stock" means, but economists definitely don't generally assume that everyone involved in the market have the same (correct?) information .
comment in response to
post
Two of my colleagues had a State Department grant suspended this morning.
comment in response to
post
And it's so easy to do.
comment in response to
post
I don't think that meets the definition of a bribe. He hired them. A bribe is when you pay someone to exercise some authority they have for illegitimate ends.
comment in response to
post
Greenland is the only way in the North America from Europe in Risk, too. And Panama is the only way up from S. America. Just sayin...
comment in response to
post
But... I also don't think fact-checking is much different from that, either. Except for maybe the subside. It's all about deciding what responses get top billing.
comment in response to
post
(2024bl) is an underutilized APA citation date index.
comment in response to
post
I bought my wife one like that, but she said it was too dense.
comment in response to
post
These replies are cracking me up.
comment in response to
post
I love GSP.
comment in response to
post
perfect timing, as always.
comment in response to
post
In his defense, he was on drugs at the time.
comment in response to
post
"I'm sad that I'm flying."
comment in response to
post
"The effect of gasoline... on fire."
comment in response to
post
I worry the most about this pick. Responsible states can substitute, in part, for a bad AG. The DoD has a ton of institutionalization and a giant popular base to resist undermining. But intel is, by it's nature, secretive, national, and insular. She could really do some damage.
comment in response to
post
I misunderstood the definition... I thought it included maintaining colonies as subordinate. After reading the Wikipedia def. of settler colonialism, it seems there is no such implication. I withdraw my comment.
comment in response to
post
Was it? There were definitely settlers, but was the U.S. West treated as a colony of the east in the 19th century? CA and TX were states by 1850.
comment in response to
post
So fun. I started with this one and ended up watching them all. I love how surprised he is by various elements and anticipating how he's going to react to later ones. It seems odd that he knows so little about the show, but it also seems legit.
comment in response to
post
Details in the report, here: open.clemson.edu/mfh_reports/7/
comment in response to
post
That's fun! But no one who could follow that explanation actually believed that blowing up the hurricane was a good idea in the first place.
comment in response to
post
I know it's cold up there, but I don't think there's a lot of sea ice in the great lakes.
comment in response to
post
That was our intramural team name in grad school.