reallyrecycle.bsky.social
World's first closed loop Circularity-as-a-Service uncompromisingly tackling plastic pollution.
Less than 17 SDGs = No SDG
Doughnut Economics #ftw
143 posts
63 followers
41 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
Even WE go to the library 😁
comment in response to
post
OK 😊
comment in response to
post
The number of people in #MAGAregrets is bad, but they didn't regret enough. Not enough of them do and many completely stand by their vote and will blame every other scapegoat.
A quick reminder.
comment in response to
post
...and they'll believe her
comment in response to
post
To be exact, it needs to do a lot more. Work to shore up constitutionally, and permanently prevent elected dictatorships must happen. And it has to be ruthless.
She isn't a joke! She's the most harmful thing ever to happen to Britain
comment in response to
post
European Parliament Elections 2019 is near PR (D'Hondt), UK voters didn't understand that and gave the whole space to Brexit Party.
comment in response to
post
The same exists in PR. It is just "masked" by the lost votes of FPTP until a certain threshold, then suddenly ugly floodgates.
PR has its problems. It can elect dictators more readily (Mussolini) and if too polarised, results in government paralysis. Benefiting the party wanting it's destruction
comment in response to
post
Talk to the transition engineers
comment in response to
post
The boss has a saying.
"Politics only exists due to incompetence in any system. It's either managing it's existence or hiding its own"
comment in response to
post
A national *Eugenics registry.
Like the Nazis, he'll just keep adding to it. It'll be trans people after that (comorbidity anyway), SEND kids and more. It won't stop.
comment in response to
post
The boss did a piece on this a week or two ago.
China holds all the cards & it's important the rest of the world understands that
vm.tiktok.com/ZNdYs5Gvt/
comment in response to
post
Don't!
comment in response to
post
No, it was as true then as it is now.
The enforcement only takes place in rétrospect.
If a murder occurs, arrest and prosecution can only occur once the crime has been committed.
If an officer PERCEIVES someone to be a sex they are not & acts on that, an offence has been committed
comment in response to
post
Correct. But that's the nature of law. Whether civil or criminal. It is enforced rétrospectively.
comment in response to
post
US
comment in response to
post
I did answer it. Whether you know I did or not. It's also in the video. The fact you didn't watch it is your choice.
So a block it is.
comment in response to
post
You didn't answer the question.
comment in response to
post
(the law being the Equality Act)
If you had to defend someone with Kleinfelters using the Equality Act, what clauses would you use to do it and how?
comment in response to
post
Nope. Watch the vid.
The law doesn't work the way you assume here.
comment in response to
post
...unless they themselves went through Gender Reassignment, which is a drastic approach to change oneself into a body that has rights. It's utterly dehumanising.
comment in response to
post
But Intersex people self-defining as male or female (biologically they can be chromosomally ambiguous - see image). The move to define only two sexes biologically under Equality Act, means Intersex people cease to exist & cannot self define into a characteristic that is protected.
comment in response to
post
Watch the vid, as it explains towards the end.
Trans people are protected under Gender Reassignment.
comment in response to
post
The Equality Act 2010 protected characteristics for reference
comment in response to
post
They do indeed! Plus, the ruling doesn't allow them to do this arbitrarily anyway.
The only loophole it creates is for Intersex people
Everyone else is still protected "somehow"
bsky.app/profile/real...
comment in response to
post
While they could, even with this ruling the Equality Act 2010 provisions mean that would be considered discriminatory.
Meaning a cis woman who is perceived to be trans by police and searched as if she was, has been discriminated against.
Perception isnt a defence by the act.
comment in response to
post
There's some merit in this approach as it happens.
comment in response to
post
It should be! Especially for Intersex people too. Since their Equality Act protections were stripped away COMPLETELY!!
vm.tiktok.com/ZNdFKScxP/
comment in response to
post
Totally! But this is actually some 4 years old.
comment in response to
post
The bioplastics used here are also fully recyclable. Composting doesn't have to be the "out"
comment in response to
post
Yes. It's a perfect zero waste, high efficiency yield for farming too. They get paid twice for the same crop.
However, because the items made from it are effectively single use, they've been outlawed by the UK and EU.
It's a complete failure of policy there.
comment in response to
post
The far-right did this already.
www.theguardian.com/commentisfre...
comment in response to
post
Congrats!
We're still way behind. But still better off out of it.
comment in response to
post
Quiz
comment in response to
post
State enterprises ARE state ownership.
Pop quiz.
LNER (East Coast mainline). Is it
1. Private Sector (open PLC)
2. Nationalised
3. State Owned/Enterprise
comment in response to
post
UK rail's shares are just open market shares anyone can buy (unlike European state owned rail) Euro state rail operators bought & invested in UK rail, dividends is are taken not reinvested & UK passengers pay more. Subsidising rail in Europe.
Compare these 2 similar routes. 67% more expensive
comment in response to
post
Where Thatcher went wrong was selling all assets into the open market at a time when Europe was forming state Enterprises for key infrastructure.
State enterprises, as with all private businesses, can invest in & acquire other businesses. They can invest as silent partners in profitable ones.
comment in response to
post
It's more nuanced.
State enterprises are private sector.
They operate all EU transport & most of health. Orders of magnitude more efficient than public sector & profits goes back to Gov to reinvest.
Greater Manchester understands this in transport & are even surprised by surpluses