remysharp.com
Smart enough to know he's not smart enough.
🌮
đź“ŤBrighton, UK
594 posts
3,181 followers
143 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
đź‘Ť
comment in response to
post
Not quite!
comment in response to
post
Not read it yet, but you want some overflow or word break on the code examples (it forced your content into a teeeny column)
comment in response to
post
You do, but (and I need to be at a computer to be 100% on this) the doctors give permission so that you're exempt from prosecution (or along those lines)
comment in response to
post
I read that it was illegal but generally not prosecuted (that's a hand wavy way of saying: "what you said"). But it shouldn't be a crime at all. I read that the law it stems from was formed in the late(?) 1800s before women could even have a vote (not that it would have made the blindest difference)
comment in response to
post
comment in response to
post
SO MUCH SPACE! (so little compatibility…)
comment in response to
post
I've got a rider that says as much, but as someone with experience, I ask that others are paid as much as I'm offered: remysharp.com/rider
comment in response to
post
I'm doubly slow at reading non-fiction, but definitely take the recommendation. I read Minority Rule recently (non-fiction) which was excellent: remysharp.com/books/2025/m...
comment in response to
post
43inch, 32:10 rato
comment in response to
post
I bought one but until yesterday totally forgot how silly the cost was (it hasn't turned up yet - due between 11am-3:31pm…)
comment in response to
post
"couldn't make it" (due to switch 2 arriving!)
comment in response to
post
Got ours after @mikehall314.bsky.social called out @jakearchibald.com on the podcast - so yes, direct marketting one person at a time does work!
comment in response to
post
> programmer trying to argue that "LLMs are actually really useful"
Except that's not what the post is getting at. It's saying X person is "nuts" for buying in - more specifically (as per the (edited) description) shouting down arguments and concerns about LLM supported dev.
comment in response to
post
Oh, it bounced. Re-sending!
comment in response to
post
Done đź‘Ť
comment in response to
post
I should add, the wild cart cert alone when I was buying it was £500+vat - not huge, but a bit of a dent for a project that runs on a shoestring (…or fumes)
comment in response to
post
I'm pretty sure it's about not breaking existing implementations, particularly at the time the html5 spec was being worked out (and reverse engineering how browsers did their DOM rendering)
comment in response to
post
Further on this - it's quite wonderful to watch: www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltom...
comment in response to
post
thought it was to do with the parsing logic in place for `caption`. ie. That tag has to be part of a table and there's rules to how it's rendered. So using it as a caption under an image–the DOM parser would vomit it out elsewhere (or something like that... /cc @brucel.bsky.social @infrequently.org
comment in response to
post
It's…it's a mirror… that's the joke… that it's a mirror and it actually says LA…
<I'll get my coat>