richardsdaniel.bsky.social
There aren’t any, as in zero, "credible" accusations against me. Just unethical attempts to frame me, seemingly justified because I'm supposedly a bad person & they believe it makes them good people to get a falsely accused person.
905 posts
713 followers
195 following
Getting Started
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
I take some issue with the "sent to test you" portion, I doubt God sent him to test us so he could grade us. The earth belongs to satan, satan is in control, it's satan fools. Everything our egos love and crave is of satan.
comment in response to
post
- They purposely made it all about political influence for a clear reason, so they had the power & influence to do whatever they wanted. They effectively removed/limited the influence of The People for the same reason, so they were free to use & abuse their positions for their purposes alone.
comment in response to
post
This administration has more clearly exposed the corruption of this system. The ruling class, via owned politicians, shaped a system that they could fully exploit. Laws for The People & a supposed honor system for them so they could exploit & abuse authority as they wish. -
comment in response to
post
You must joking, the gop & trump's loyalists are in complete control, and if something isn't done soon, it might stay that way.
comment in response to
post
Wishful thinking, if this was actually a gov for and by the people
It wasn't too long ago that citizens were railing against the influence of lobbyists
Mysteriously, lobbyists are still around & we're fighting about abortion & gun rights
Obviously, conservative media was leveraged to accomplish that
comment in response to
post
It's a futile waste of time & effort.
comment in response to
post
People should stop thinking that arguing about the correctness of the things he's doing is the correct strategy
Like Proverbs 26:4 says, that's a waste of time & effort
The arguments don't apply because he's simply doing as he damn pleases, to spite everyone
There's no effort to make good decisions
comment in response to
post
I don't believe that trump alone is the problem here, he's largely just exploiting a system of abuse of power that the ruling class worked at establishing for themselves, which is entirely unconstitutional. But since all involved are themselves ruling class, no one gives a damn, they love it.
comment in response to
post
comment in response to
post
I think you're very correct.
comment in response to
post
Not following 100%
comment in response to
post
First of all, people of character would quit rather than go along with it, they're supposed to refuse to do illegal arrests. As usual, where is the far too often useless supreme court? ICE agents must be magats, or they would refuse illegal orders to do warrantless arrests or entries.
comment in response to
post
That's not a good comparison. This is a problem that has existed for a long time in this country. Politicians illegitimately made it all about the office holder and unconstitutionally made their responsibilities & the people dead last. Those laws need to trashed. We've ignored reality to feel good.
comment in response to
post
It's his plan for massive profits.
comment in response to
post
If the hatch act is a law, the trump administration doesn't have the authority to do that. So why would it take affect?
comment in response to
post
Tell me how everything that's been happening isn't proof of an organized conspiracy to take control of this gov.
comment in response to
post
Is that how they're becoming wealthy? Are they receiving bribes & payoffs in smaller cash payments to hide the flow of money.
comment in response to
post
"Political Speak" is perfectly legal. Politicians & candidates can say just about anything in an effort to win elections. Of course, legality doesn't establish personal character or integrity.
Politicians violated their oaths while redefining the system to serve themselves & their benefactors.
comment in response to
post
👏 👏 👏
comment in response to
post
So, musk & his brats are either working with the enemy, or they're entirely incompetent.
comment in response to
post
I understand that, but to some degree, he's putting his pride before all else. He can't put up any sort of fight or resistance if he's gone. In the navel world, captains go down with the ship. Now, if they all quit, that would be significant.
comment in response to
post
I may not have a complete understanding of it, but quitting also dumps your problem on the next guy, and it ends the resistance against it. When trump/doge was taking over departments of everything, quitting was surrendering & handing the keys over to them. We shouldn't have to fall on our swords.
comment in response to
post
I'm not convinced that quitting in protest or an objection is a good thing. You say he did it for you and us, didn't he abandon you and us? Perhaps it was a selfish act.
comment in response to
post
I think the biggest reason is that he refuses to be defeated or surrender. He always has to, at very least appear victorious. Being forced to undo something isn't a win. Secondly, he might be testing the waters to see how far he can go, or if the supreme court will or can stop him.
comment in response to
post
He'd have them run over, or at very least beaten and arrested.
comment in response to
post
Will trump pardon them?
comment in response to
post
Isn't it ridiculous and defamation to call illegal immigrants "terrorists"? Does he, a non-elected aid, have any protection of "political speak"?
comment in response to
post
If politicians & others were following the "for & by the people" requirement in the constitution, if you sold health insurance, you would have to provide health insurance. You wouldn't be allowed to put any phrasing in policies letting you out of that responsibility. This is for & by business owners
comment in response to
post
A worn thread.
comment in response to
post
He's also a golf champion.
comment in response to
post
While there's likely some truth to that, I think 225+ years of the ruling class exploiting political abuse for their own purposes, is actually entirely to blame for this situation. If they had secured the system from political abuse & not just from The People, this wouldn't be happening.
comment in response to
post
Just because the constitution lays out one method of getting rid of some appointed & elected officials, it might not definitively eliminate other possibilities "as needed". The founding fathers left a lot of room for unforeseen situations. Now that self-interested politicians are an issue........?
comment in response to
post
Their need to "win" outweighs everything else
This happened a long time ago when the ruling class took over completely & started passing unconstitutional laws to make everything about them instead of The People & actual values which they tried to completely redefine, claiming "values" are their laws
comment in response to
post
It's been a fairly slow process.
comment in response to
post
The problem with all of the dumb & stupid stuff is that it results in ignoring real motives & objectives.
comment in response to
post
Just like with covid, they think they're safe and actually want the weak and inferiors that they view as a burden, to die off and stop costing them money. Narcissism prevents them from caring about anyone else.
comment in response to
post
We're nearly as hateful & narcissistic as the nazis. I think that's why "they" made the nazis out to be only about racism, so they could keep their precious hate & superiority. If we were going to learn the correct lesson from WWII, it would be that hate & superiority are to be avoided at all costs.
comment in response to
post
Anyone they want to get rid of is conveniently labeled a terrorist. Isn't there a legal definition?
comment in response to
post
If we really examine "our" politics in it's entirety, trump isn't doing too much more than what the ruling class did when it took complete control of the gov, long ago. They've been exploiting abuse of power & legislation forever. They've kept this system vulnerable to political abuse.
comment in response to
post
By definition, wasn't "our" bombing of the Houthi rebels terrorism? I'm referring to precisely what was done and what the objective was. I have very little knowledge about the situation, and don't understand why the US got involved in their civil war, so I'm I'm not speaking on that.
comment in response to
post
Poor choice of words? It doesn't seem like that's "why", it seems like that's what differentiates them from one another?