stevelattanzio.bsky.social
only positive news covfefe
113 posts
84 followers
54 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
And the whole Trump Presidency is rife with historically large conflicts of interest he and his family profit from.
Feels like a Matthew 7:3–5 scenario.
comment in response to
post
Some processes are imperfect, and some experts may have conflicts of interest. But this administration’s approach seems to be: Find the worst 1%, discredit the other 99%, and then hand power to people with zero expertise with exact opposite view out of spite. That’s not reform. That’s sabotage.
comment in response to
post
I found the account. It is there. @jd-vance-1.bsky.social
comment in response to
post
JD Vance on Bluesky would be amazing.
comment in response to
post
History is clear: federal troops enter states when invited (1992 LA) or to stop rights violations (Selma). Forcing troops into a state against its will? That’s not “precedent” — that’s George III redux.
comment in response to
post
We get gay conversion therapy for Navy ships before a single trade deal.
comment in response to
post
So Trump believes that the deep-state thought of a plan to execute Biden, then create a clone or robot that gradually loses its ability to communicate and refuses to drop out, and gets him reelected? He’s gonna lead to MAGA conspiracies about himself being some type of bot/clone/agent at this rate.
comment in response to
post
Stop saying TACO, guys. It's really mean. Clearly you are hurting his feelings and you know that. Just stop! No more TACO! Should not be writing TACO and making it trend. That is mean. Some people write TACO like 4 or more times in a post. TACO!
comment in response to
post
2025 human/automation productivity is ~70/30. In 5 years it might flip and be 30/70, but the total production is 3x 2025, meaning human productivity actually increases by almost 30%. We just become smaller piece of much larger pie.
comment in response to
post
Man, Trump could’ve avoided the TACO allegations by just waiting for the courts to cancel his tariffs.
comment in response to
post
They’re literally telling you that something isn’t real BECAUSE you can see it. And other things are real BECAUSE you can’t see them.
comment in response to
post
To be fair, you might expect the avg American to answer this with something tangentially correct like, “It’s the right to free speech.” But the Sec of Homeland Security giving the worst possible answer so confidently?
comment in response to
post
It must be really hard for Kamala Harris to see Republicans spend so much effort arguing that she should have been POTUS.
comment in response to
post
I was so confused how they read so deep into 8647 to think 86 meant to kill until I learned they invented 8646 and they were projecting their own meaning. Same accounts whining about Comey were posting 8646 not long ago!
comment in response to
post
Comey is so f’n hapless—wins the 2016 election for Trump, but when Trump demands a pledge of absolute loyalty he refuses, so Trump throws him away. Now he posts a pic of what he imagines is probably like a bday or something and will get sent to El Salvador.
comment in response to
post
The legal standard for bribery and corruption does not require an explicit quid pro quo. Though we’ll almost certainly see one emerge and those currently defending this by claiming there’s no obvious quid pro quo will have moved on to their next exercise in cognitive dissonance.
comment in response to
post
The only defense ever given to Trump’s corruption is whataboutism about Biden—but the largest total imaginary grift of the Biden family is orders of magnitude less than the known daily grift of the Trump family.
comment in response to
post
If Qatar gives $400M gift, they expect much more than $400M in benefit. Better believe he's not giving them free nights at Trump hotels in return--what he gives them comes from selling out the interests of the American people.
comment in response to
post
If someone took something from you, gave it to another person, admitted the error, then said it’s too late now, done is done, and then you go directly to the person who has it, and they say it’s out of their control too, you are being bullshitted. Except here we’re talking about a guy’s life.
comment in response to
post
Memecoinification of the entire market.
Pumps imply dumps.
I bet Ackman is trimming his equity exposure tomorrow fwiw.
comment in response to
post
My sister and I used to fight over who got to bring the laundry basket upstairs for my mom. It was my turn, so I did it. Out of spite, my sister went to take it back down to come up again. But she fell and broke her collar bone. All this is to say, Trump wants to take the S&P 500 to 3800 (1/20/21).
comment in response to
post
random neuron firings within 3 lbs of meat in an single octogenarian skull is driving larger negative personal outcomes for decades for the average world citizen than for the orange man it resides in for a few more years.
comment in response to
post
pretty much arbitrary amounts of money since all stock sale but wonder if he’s looking at these as a “valid” valuation to borrow against his shares.
comment in response to
post
It shows you how shitty things are that I don’t even care about this because I assume there are 100 other trivially easy ways for China to get this info.
comment in response to
post
idk why
comment in response to
post
wdym you don’t think that color coordination can save the world?
comment in response to
post
What will Elon be wearing?
comment in response to
post
Unfortunately, the precedent for this is a full pardon.
comment in response to
post
The fact that Republicans will often oppose Trump before leaving (one way or another) shows how each Republican is truly opposed to Trump privately but are all captive out of fear—why be in Congress if you have no power to impact policy? They seek power but will never have it.
comment in response to
post
Skol!
comment in response to
post
Immediately thought of this classic.
comment in response to
post
youtu.be/SWmQbk5h86w?...
comment in response to
post
And in 2028 when we can plainly show that Trump once again accelerated our national debt, MAGA won’t believe it. (Caveat being they could inflate the debt away, but then MAGA wouldn’t believe those numbers either).
comment in response to
post
It’s shadow President 101 that you should have all the power without the accountability. Especially if you are the authoritarian flavor.
comment in response to
post
Streisand effect incoming!
comment in response to
post
Well, hopefully they get a free Streisand effect out of it!
comment in response to
post
Building the airplane while you fly it is one thing. Dismantling the airplane while you fly it is another.