swiftonsecurity.com
computer security person. former helpdesk.
7,500 posts
91,361 followers
839 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
A reminder to use your phone search tool, now enhanced with the latest AI description detections, which are vastly expanded compared to the tech used before.
I just searched "paperclip" and it found this.
I use this trick quite a lot. Hell search "blue dress mountains" and it will find things.
comment in response to
post
Great post sir. Had not seen this anywhere else.
comment in response to
post
The guys in this are fucking heroes wow. The years they've spent to become the man today who sits and looks in the camera and knows it's time to do this, for everyone.
comment in response to
post
Banger post
comment in response to
post
Congrats
comment in response to
post
If you see your employee ID anywhere in the query details of a web result, try changing it to your coworker's...
That has worked, but latest in my career was basically useless information that's already in Outlook. Would NEVER want that kind of thing in a public service, however.
comment in response to
post
Okay if I remember correctly this was just the tool to see a prospective approval it didn't actually go through.
I do periodic "wonder if this works" stuff on internal systems, like trying to get the HR tool to disclose private employee data fields (it didn't, but it's pretty important to know!)
comment in response to
post
The Discover tab
comment in response to
post
Another image from work
comment in response to
post
I asked and they made it and sent it to me
comment in response to
post
2) I realize that it is extremely hip and cool in whatever group chat or Discord (or on here, in fact) to go "How dare people enjoy this fun thing when there is agony and suffering at home and abroad?!" and I will repeat my statement that this is an attitude for a religious ascetic.
comment in response to
post
Oh the spy Pollard guy too. People fucking furious over that. I knew about this stuff in like 2008.
comment in response to
post
I always feel like I'm having a stroke when elected leaders seemingly have no idea this happened. A lot of people in the military who were there are pretty fucking mad about it, not like protester people.
comment in response to
post
These only show up a couple times a year and is evidently on quite a few people's search alerts.
Wait till you see the price...
www.ebay.com/itm/27718156...
comment in response to
post
TIL
comment in response to
post
Side note: the DOD performing top secret tests to see if their nuclear launch facilities could be disabled by EMP, then when it worked, letting the facility employees go their whole life believing it was Non-nuclear proliferation Aliens so the soviets wouldn't find out is absolutely devious work. 💀
comment in response to
post
Thank you I'm gonna work on promoting this tomorrow. Truly I have no limit commenting on anything else you have in possible best. How any of this works or the production schedule or budget etc.
comment in response to
post
And the sheer *effort* just to watch one. Wheeling in an 8 or 16 mm projector, looping the film, setting up a screen, syncing the audio tape, closing the curtains, and only then can you watch it.
comment in response to
post
Please tell me more about what you know about the context of these videos, if you have moment. I do know some but it sounds like you know moore and I would love to highlight some of that. (plus as a favor to me personally I love this stuff)
comment in response to
post
Please see DM no rush
comment in response to
post
Tell me more please!!!!!! I will repost some of it
comment in response to
post
It's a reference to a subculture Internet thing with a singer. She didn't come up with it but the response politically has proved her out.
comment in response to
post
I'm aligned with you on this post a pretty big amount.
comment in response to
post
It's also wild just how small an audience this stuff was made for. It wasn't really on TV or in public theaters. Most ordinary line workers at the company didn't need to see much promo stuff, and the company didn't want to halt work for screening.
Audience sizes would have any YouTuber weeping.
comment in response to
post
I mean? my post agrees with you. He's incapable compared to like an actual competent mayor with an understanding of anything, that doesn't mean worse. I don't know the other candidates enough I just know Cuomo really sucks so I can give AOC a pass here. NYC can select their own future. Not my job.
comment in response to
post
With the emphasis I am not her constituency and thus do not entirely follow everything outside of political social media bubble, I think I know what you're talking about, she's made some stuff where like I said I am not aligning with her on. It was maybe prudent, but then again it was not policy.
comment in response to
post
Yeah I have complicated feelings but frankly New York can just get what it wants whatever.
comment in response to
post
I actually have dramatic differences with AOC on some ideological things. But she is enormously studious, loves being informed on the things in front of her, is smart as shit, and – in a properly working system – is not a dictator like the poison of Trump people deluded themselves into. She's it.
comment in response to
post
Another deep variance in educational films then – a captive audience. They were selected by "elites" for consumption to people not on a recreational lark. This is not the YouTube incentive system. It is long-form targeted content for people usually prepared to receive it.
It's very deliberate.
comment in response to
post
The physicality of demonstrations and vizualizations and manual animation of educational presentations from the age of film – and their educational distribution – are completely novel compared to now.
comment in response to
post
😮
comment in response to
post
I mean it does kinda, but if you're ever in a situation a user would actually see this, some other device governance issues are going on...